[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] 86 Daytona Turbo Z C/S with a full 89 Shelby swap, back on the road and soon to be painted (and lose that Oggie Fisher black) 83 Porsche 944, 5 speed, all stock. 2014 Toyota Tacoma 4x4, 5 speed, daily driver. 2017 Trek 1.2 bicycle.
The two crusty looking ones are for a 'TRW' style steering rack.
1994 Shadow Sedan. 2.2 N/A, A568 400,000 miles. "the science experiment"
1987 Shelby CSX #418. Long term rebuild and restore ?
what makes the other two not right??
The one with the end turned down is for a Saginaw steering rack. The TRW one with the full hex cut on it looks like an original equipment and the other TRW one with just the two wrench flats looks like an aftermarket replacement. FWIW the last time I went through this I used AC Delco professional on the inners Here and they seem to be ok. Made in Taiwan, used to be USA but anything else is still better than Moog.
Edit: looking back I see I mis-read the picture descriptions and skipped over the difference. Buy one listed for a 'TRW' rack.
Last edited by 135sohc; 02-02-2017 at 05:59 PM.
1994 Shadow Sedan. 2.2 N/A, A568 400,000 miles. "the science experiment"
1987 Shelby CSX #418. Long term rebuild and restore ?
The one in the center would work, is 3/16 inch shorter and would leave 1 inch of penetration into outer tie rod. Also the notch for the rack boot is 3/8 of a inch back. Both replacements are Raybestos brand. The one in the center would be safe to use, but the differences are enough to question it.
After looking at a few online part stores, none of the TRW style inner tie rods looked like the original. I went ahead and used the tie rod in the center. It fit and worked perfectly fine.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] 86 Daytona Turbo Z C/S with a full 89 Shelby swap, back on the road and soon to be painted (and lose that Oggie Fisher black) 83 Porsche 944, 5 speed, all stock. 2014 Toyota Tacoma 4x4, 5 speed, daily driver. 2017 Trek 1.2 bicycle.