Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: 3.5 V6: Any thoughts on reliability or such?

  1. #1
    Hybrid booster
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Wastelands of NJ
    Posts
    729

    3.5 V6: Any thoughts on reliability or such?

    I'm looking at a 93 Eagle Vision as a daily driver. It's in great shape with only 50 thou miles on it. I'm not looking to hot rod it but figured I'd ask you V6 gurus for your opinion on this engine.

  2. #2
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Vigo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    San Antonio,TX
    Posts
    10,798

    Re: 3.5 V6: Any thoughts on reliability or such?

    The engine in those is just fine. Non-interference timing belt. No major mechanical issues that i can think of.. They are picky about air pockets in the cooling system but they have a bleeder right on top for it.

    Dont push the red button.You hear me?

  3. #3
    Supporting Member Turbo Mopar Contributor jonnymopar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Southeastern MA
    Posts
    780

    Re: 3.5 V6: Any thoughts on reliability or such?

    I've always liked the 1st generation Vision/Intrepid. Little bit of a strange drivetrain layout for a front-wheel drive car, but then again I haven't done any hardcore work on one, so who knows if it even matters. Nice comfortable, reliable cars as far as I can tell.
    Jon J.

    1989 Daytona ES 2.4L DOHC
    2003 Neon SXT - gone but never forgotten

    If it ain't broke, fix it 'till it is!

  4. #4
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Vigo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    San Antonio,TX
    Posts
    10,798

    Re: 3.5 V6: Any thoughts on reliability or such?

    They're not hard to work on. I did a fair amount of work to the 97 3.5 intrepid i had. Timing belt, water pump, fans, motor mounts, coolant gaskets behind the inner timing cover, took the plenum off a couple times, removed and rebuilt the transmission, etc. Some of it was not easy but none of it was especially hard. I think the thing that bothered me the most was the water pipe that runs behind the engine and bolts down under the bellhousing bolts. It was kind of a ----- when i was dropping the trans.

    Dont push the red button.You hear me?

  5. #5
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Salt Lake City UT
    Posts
    1,603

    Re: 3.5 V6: Any thoughts on reliability or such?

    I had a 99 300m was a great motor, they say that it is common to get 300,000 miles on them with regular maintenance. Mine had 230,000 ran real good, the transmission is the weak link on those not the motor from my experience

  6. #6
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Pickering, ontario
    Posts
    2,670

    Re: 3.5 V6: Any thoughts on reliability or such?

    Overall, I'm not a fan of the LH bodied cars, but for the right price, I would own one. Engine wise, I think that's the least of your worries. Transmissions (keep on top of the cooler line leaks) Suspension (lots of sway bar links and inner/outer tie rod ends and control arms) and an assortment of trim issues like shrinking door weather strips and door check straps would be priority above engine. If you are looking for a little extra oomph for free, there's a noise reducing restriction in the intake track between the air filter and the y connector. Easy to remove and make a notable improvement.

  7. #7
    Hybrid booster
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Wastelands of NJ
    Posts
    729

    Re: 3.5 V6: Any thoughts on reliability or such?

    Thanks fellas! Lots of great info here!

  8. #8
    Supporting Member Turbo Mopar Contributor jonnymopar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Southeastern MA
    Posts
    780

    Re: 3.5 V6: Any thoughts on reliability or such?

    Quote Originally Posted by 1BADVAN View Post
    I had a 99 300m was a great motor, they say that it is common to get 300,000 miles on them with regular maintenance. Mine had 230,000 ran real good, the transmission is the weak link on those not the motor from my experience
    That's a little different 3.5L, but another fantastic engine. I've always thought it was crazy that the 3.5L in the 300M & 2nd gen Intrepid, same year, stock-for-stock, was as powerful as the GM supercharged 3.8L. I'll never understand why the GM was so conservatively tuned from the factory. I was so surprised (and disappointed) when I got to drive one.

    [/tangent]
    Jon J.

    1989 Daytona ES 2.4L DOHC
    2003 Neon SXT - gone but never forgotten

    If it ain't broke, fix it 'till it is!

  9. #9
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Vigo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    San Antonio,TX
    Posts
    10,798

    Re: 3.5 V6: Any thoughts on reliability or such?

    I have raced a 300m against a similar year supercharged regal GS. Both stock. Similar performance once rolling but the Buick was much stronger off the line. It shows clearly in their 1/4 mile times too.

    Dont push the red button.You hear me?

  10. #10
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,178

    Re: 3.5 V6: Any thoughts on reliability or such?

    LH's can suffer electrical glitches. Nothing I worry about burning the car down or causing concern for reliability but just going along and the interior lights can blink and hear the bcm relay clicking ect. Decent overall platform, don't think it ever came anywhere near its potential before getting killed off.
    1994 Shadow Sedan. 2.2 N/A, A568 400,000 miles. "the science experiment"
    1987 Shelby CSX #418. Long term rebuild and restore ?

Similar Threads

  1. T-III Reliability improvement
    By 1BADVAN in forum 16v Factory Engines
    Replies: 90
    Last Post: 05-02-2018, 10:08 AM
  2. thoughts?
    By moparfwdsleeper in forum Interior, Exterior and Chassis Modifications
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-15-2009, 07:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •