Originally Posted by
Reaper1
My question is why does the timing HAVE to be different for different throttle positions? For a performance application, if it shifts harsh, who cares? It's also my argument for why the adaptives can be left out. As long as the shift occurs within the prescribed time, in a performance application, it shouldn't matter. Set the rpm in, rpm out, and time for it to complete...no matter what. The load (based on throttle position and MAP) will determine the activation point for the shift. That parameter would no longer have anything to do with the clutch application timing.