Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: 16v head on common block?

  1. #21
    turbo addict Turbo Mopar Contributor iTurbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Gillette, Wyoming
    Posts
    5,384

    Re: 16v head on common block?

    Quote Originally Posted by Force Fed Mopar View Post
    Are we talking about this with factory belt routing and tension, or the modified setup Jackson came up with and so many people run now? Or both?
    I have only ever run stock setup.

    I did have one stock TIII tensioner fail on me once when the bearings fell apart; which caused carnage and other failures, but have yet to ever lose a belt, oil pump, I-shaft/bearings etc.

  2. #22
    Supporting Member Turbo Mopar Contributor rx2mazda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Baltimore,MD
    Posts
    2,925

    Re: 16v head on common block?

    Quote Originally Posted by Force Fed Mopar View Post
    The 8v and TIII dish is roughly the same shape, just different depths.
    Both. TIII's don't eat timing belts, never have. Just wanted to clear that up cause it's misinformation. I-shafts are a different story and it has a cause.

  3. #23
    Supporting Member Turbo Mopar Contributor 2.216VTurbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    SoCal the OC
    Posts
    6,675

    Re: 16v head on common block?

    Quote Originally Posted by rx2mazda View Post
    Both. TIII's don't eat timing belts, never have. Just wanted to clear that up cause it's misinformation. I-shafts are a different story and it has a cause.

    Statement Based on all the miles you've driven a TIII? Like 500, 750 maybe?

    AJ (no More Alan) 84 Rampage RT TIII/568 Quaife 87 GLHS dealer optioned Red 16V Masi/568/Quaife
    90 Masi 16V White/Ginger/Black
    89 TC Masi 16V Red/Ginger/Black
    86 GLHS #110 RoadRace Built 89 CSX-VNT Recaro Car
    89 Turbo Mini 'Woody' 85 GLHT 'RedBox'
    2014 Explorer DD'r 3.5Twin Turbo Ecoboost AWD and 500HP
    My profile page has over 20,000 views, I'm somebody LOL

  4. #24
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    7,065

    Re: 16v head on common block?

    Quote Originally Posted by Force Fed Mopar View Post

    The 8v and TIII dish is roughly the same shape, just different depths.
    Since the piston doesn't match the chamber, any change does mess with quench. Deeper = more deadspace where the piston doesn't match the chamber. Would be cool to see someone make a nice piston. I don't really feel like Dodge cared and a lot of engines out there seem to be designed without caring on 4 valve heads.
    Brent GREAT DEPRESSION RACING 1992 Duster 3.0T The Junkyard - MS II, OEM 10:1 -[I] Old - 11.5@125 22psi $90 [U]Stock[/U] 3.0 Junk Motor - 1 bar MAP [/I] 1994 Spirit 3.0T - 11.5@120 20 psi - Daily :eyebrows: Holset He351 -FT600 - 393whp 457ft/lb @18psi 1994 Spirit 3.0T a670 - He341, stock fuel, BEGI. Wife's into kid's project. 1990 Lebaron Coupe 2.2 TI/II non IC, a413 1990 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1993 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1994 Duster 3.0 A543 1981 Starlet KP61 Potential driver -- 1981 Starlet KP61 Parts -- 1983 Starlet KP61 Drag 2005 Durango Hemi Limited -- 1998 Dodge 12v 47re. AFC mods, No plate, Mack plug, Boost elbow -- 2011 Dodge 6.7 G56

  5. #25
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Hazelwood, MO
    Posts
    6,566

    Re: 16v head on common block?

    Quote Originally Posted by rx2mazda View Post
    Both. TIII's don't eat timing belts, never have. Just wanted to clear that up cause it's misinformation. I-shafts are a different story and it has a cause.
    Carrol, I have a friend that can dispute the timing belt thing. His R/T went through several belts in a short period of time even using the tensioner tool, etc. We never did figure out why, but that was before there were solutions for the really high valve seat pressure, etc. I found out last night that the engine is still alive and running somewhere in the NE in a Daytona.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ondonti View Post
    Since the piston doesn't match the chamber, any change does mess with quench. Deeper = more deadspace where the piston doesn't match the chamber. Would be cool to see someone make a nice piston. I don't really feel like Dodge cared and a lot of engines out there seem to be designed without caring on 4 valve heads.
    I agree. We do not have very good pistons at all. I had made some designs YEARS ago for the 8V engine, but I never got the chance to try it out..

  6. #26
    Supporting Member Turbo Mopar Contributor rx2mazda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Baltimore,MD
    Posts
    2,925

    Re: 16v head on common block?

    Quote Originally Posted by Reaper1 View Post
    Carrol, I have a friend that can dispute the timing belt thing. His R/T went through several belts in a short period of time even using the tensioner tool, etc. We never did figure out why, but that was before there were solutions for the really high valve seat pressure, etc. I found out last night that the engine is still alive and running somewhere in the NE in a Daytona.
    There's always one lol. Btw, I run stock retainers(when it runs ). I'll probably shred a TB now.....

  7. #27
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Hazelwood, MO
    Posts
    6,566

    Re: 16v head on common block?

    Quote Originally Posted by rx2mazda View Post
    There's always one lol. Btw, I run stock retainers(when it runs ). I'll probably shred a TB now.....
    Man, don't say that! I don't wish that for you guys at all! The good thing about shredding or breaking a timing belt is the engine will stop running...unlike stripping the teeth on the I-shaft/oil pump. So, as long as the engine is still non-interference, throw a new belt on and keep going!

  8. #28
    Buy my stuff!!!!!!!!!!! :O) Turbo Mopar Vendor turbovanmanČ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Abbotsford, BC
    Posts
    44,167

    Re: 16v head on common block?

    A bit late but the passenger side motor mount bracket is different, the 8 valve unit won't clear the cam gears.

    Also, if the belt breaks, these aren't interference engines, with stock cams anyways,

    I've broken tons of shitt but never a belt.
    1989 FWD Turbo Caravan-2.5 TIII, GT35R, auto, a/c, cruise, pwr windows/locks, fully loaded with interior and ran with full exhaust. RETIRED FOR A FEW YEARS! 12.57@104 :O)
    1984 Chev Getaway van, 6.2 Diesel with a remote mounted turbo setup burning WMO-For sale.
    2003 GSW 2.0L TDI, auto, fully loaded, modified, 360K-wife's.
    2004 GSW TDI, 5 speed, fully loaded, modified.

    Aurora ignition wires for sale. Link to info

    Super60 roller cams or custom/billet cams. Link to info

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. magnum r/t head on common block
    By MILKCARTON in forum 2.0L/2.4L 16V Engine Swaps!
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-09-2015, 10:43 PM
  2. Weight difference between tall block and common block 2.5 motors?
    By ATaylorRacing in forum Engine - Block, Piston, Heads, Intakes
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-21-2011, 06:23 PM
  3. Engine Common block head bolts - ARP
    By J&H Ryan in forum Parts For Sale
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-08-2011, 04:52 PM
  4. Engine WTB 2.2 T-II 89 common block head to pan, and 555 transmission
    By tehdrizzle in forum Parts Wanted
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-18-2011, 12:22 AM
  5. okay non-common block and common block parts?
    By TurboII in forum Maintenance & General Tech
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-02-2008, 04:01 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •