Never did I say his car is not impressive or fast! But he doesn't have to brag,and sound like a know it all about it! And seriously, what is really all that different about his car/combo from that of other members cars on this forum other than Rob is running higher boost levels than most everyone. I guess I will just skip over Rob's posts in the future because he just seems to rub me the wrong way often in the posts.
It doesn't matter to me how you address your car.... You sh!t rolls!! The numbers posted in your sig is impressive!!
I don't know what I'm doing wrong other than a loss of interest of getting more power out of my car. Having a different cam for my car would be of some interest to me though.... Hence me reading through this thread.
Continue.....
you can count the halo cars for our little tdtm world on one hand...the more they announce their accomplishments and discoveries the better I say...things would definitely be more boring without them...remember what they do so can you and they are happy to help and teach
I don't think there is any chest thumping going on by anyone, vendors are tired of getting beaten up everytime they bring out new products so they get their backs up. I am really surprised they stick around.
I think it would be more of a topic that deserves its own thread and easier to discuss than wade thru this whatever thread.
You started off saying intakes don't affect or aren't affected by camshaft selection, then you say it does. Which one is it? IMHO, I think that camshafts ARE affected by intakes, it does in the V8 world etc and head work, etc all play a key in camshaft selection, if it didn't, Nascar engines wouldn't make the power they do with restrictor plates on the intake.
1989 FWD Turbo Caravan-2.5 TIII, GT35R, auto, a/c, cruise, pwr windows/locks, fully loaded with interior and ran with full exhaust. RETIRED FOR A FEW YEARS! 12.57@104 :O)
1984 Chev Getaway van, 6.2 Diesel with a remote mounted turbo setup burning WMO-For sale.
2003 GSW 2.0L TDI, auto, fully loaded, modified, 360K-wife's.
2004 GSW TDI, 5 speed, fully loaded, modified.
Aurora ignition wires for sale. Link to info
Super60 roller cams or custom/billet cams. Link to info
What does it take to get through to you bro? I Told you the mistake you were making and to READ it more carefully so you could understand what was being said.
This is the post you asked me about;
Originally Posted by Shadow
This statement shows you know absolutely Nothing about cams or performance PERIOD! Boost, on the intake side has ZERO to do with cam selection!!!!!!!!!!
Can you explain this one please?
It has Nothing to do with intake effect on cam selection. It is Only speaking of BOOST effect on cam selection.
Get it now?
Robert Mclellan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wambNdfnu5M
10.04 @ 143.28mph (144.82 highest mph)
Worlds fastest 8v MTX Shelby Charger
Manitoba's Fastest 4cyl!
8 valve, No Nitrous!
New clutch combo is the SH!T!
1989 FWD Turbo Caravan-2.5 TIII, GT35R, auto, a/c, cruise, pwr windows/locks, fully loaded with interior and ran with full exhaust. RETIRED FOR A FEW YEARS! 12.57@104 :O)
1984 Chev Getaway van, 6.2 Diesel with a remote mounted turbo setup burning WMO-For sale.
2003 GSW 2.0L TDI, auto, fully loaded, modified, 360K-wife's.
2004 GSW TDI, 5 speed, fully loaded, modified.
Aurora ignition wires for sale. Link to info
Super60 roller cams or custom/billet cams. Link to info
You've hit the nail right on the head! How easy it is to believe the only difference is that I run higher boost than everyone else.
That is the biggest misconception and cop-out there is, and I've heard it too many times to count.
Many have tried, and many have even run Higher boost than the Charger and with Bigger turbo's and Still couldn't make more power.
The simple Fact is that the Charger has made power to 39psi and it's Not done there. (it's still gaining a MPH/ lb of boost) I don't know of another 8v that can say the same except Warren's.
So that Myth (that I just run more boost than anyone else) needs to Die, because it just ain't true. Believe me, if others could do it, they would. (and maybe in the not so distant future they will )
How can I answer Q's that I Don't see anyone else attempting to answer without sounding like a "know it all"? How (in your mind) can I talk about the Charger without it sounding like bragging?
Simple answer; I Can't, it has to do with how You want to perceive what is being said. My answers would be no different if I were using any other car that I was as familiar with than they are with the Charger.
Again, you are entitle to your opinion, sorry I rub you the wrong way.
Robert Mclellan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wambNdfnu5M
10.04 @ 143.28mph (144.82 highest mph)
Worlds fastest 8v MTX Shelby Charger
Manitoba's Fastest 4cyl!
8 valve, No Nitrous!
New clutch combo is the SH!T!
Well, that would be the Bomb, but think about what you're saying. I can tell you that the largest % of people do not or can not pay That much attention to detail.
There are only a few individuals that would be capable of what you're proposing and it would take a Lifetime to do that much R&D and data collecting.
I have been Hounding people to pressure tap their systems for over 5 years and I've got maybe 4-5 to do it! Warren first posted his cam results what, 8 years ago or longer? Nothing came of it till I took his advise and slapped the F4 into the Charger. Now here we are 5 years later and a few are starting to run the F4 and see the results I was talking about.
This community moves SLOWLY if it even moves at all!
So I think you have a Great idea, but the reality is that people will choose a cam based on same type build/ same type gains much sooner than doing the kind of "real work" you are describing my friend.
- - - Updated - - -
Now That's Funny! lol
- - - Updated - - -
Fair enough, agree to disagree you're on your own bro......
Robert Mclellan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wambNdfnu5M
10.04 @ 143.28mph (144.82 highest mph)
Worlds fastest 8v MTX Shelby Charger
Manitoba's Fastest 4cyl!
8 valve, No Nitrous!
New clutch combo is the SH!T!
I'm definitely going to be doing this.
Crusty shadow: RGL10 did it and has a video of it http://www.turbododge.com/forums/f4/...ml#post3410673
What are you talking about? Nobody hung onto the old logic that the 1 piece was all the intake you'd ever need. And there was never any resistance to trying PT lifters in these things. Or that a wide band is necessary over the old narrow band. Those are distinct examples where this community embraced discussion and changes right from the......yeah never mind you got me. Heck I resisted all three for years and still use a 1 piece.
1991 Chrysler Lebaron GTC convertible - a568 - 15psi FWD Stage 3, FMIC, TII Garrett turbo, two of the big ones
Hey Shadow, please keep posting, your info. is as good as it gets and better than almost all the rest!!!
Thanks
Randy
There is no logical reason to call an Engine a motor.
Randy Hicks
86 GLHS60
86 GLHS 373 : SOLD, but never forgotten
89 Turbo Minivan
83 Turbo Rampage : SOLD
Edmonton,Alberta,Canada
If you truly want the misconception of the higher boost levels as being the reason to die, then why don't you say in this thread the very reason (s) that make (s) your combo so special/better than everyone else. And if you truly want to help people learn and progress, I feel you should let the cat (s) out of the bag (in simple straight to the point words)! It could change my opinion if you would. Otherwise the opinion I have and I am sure others have will remain the same. Of the parts that I have seen mentioned in your combo I fail to see anything really different or special from what many other members have on this forum and other forums as well. And not only Turbo Dodge forums,but other manufacturers/brands. What's the secret (s)? 39 PSI x 12 horsepower per PSI equals adding 468 horsepower to what ever the engine makes N/A (approx. 100 horsepower) which equals a total of 568 horsepower. That is real close to your horsepower claim but of the norm to what MANY other people make or can make with there combo!
Last edited by glhs875; 11-06-2014 at 09:27 AM.