Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 147

Thread: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

  1. #1
    boostaholic Turbo Mopar Contributor
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Mannheim, Germany
    Posts
    1,491

    Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    I been using my new Super 50/ stg.2 hybrid for a few months on the street now and miss the much faster response and midrange punch from the Super 60 I was using before. Is a Super 70 a compromise between these two or is it just as laggy as a hybrid?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC][FONT=Comic Sans MS]'91 Shadow convertible 2.5 auto, three core RP IC, S60/.48 stg 1, ported two-piece intake/52mm TB, Menegon +1 swirl, 88 turbo cam, Venolias, Crower rods, TU deep sump pan, ported exhaust, 3" from SV to TP, Hughes TC, Peloquin diff, DSS L5 driveshafts, Shelgame cal, Koni struts/shocks. [/FONT]

  2. #2
    boostaholic
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,454

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    Stage 2 wheel is better for flow, not so much for spool, depends on your setup though.
    If your mostly stock, you found the disadvantage.
    I installed an HY 35 last year, big change from T2, but I now have a 2.5, larger valve ported head, ported exhaust, custom intake and 3" exhaust to spool it.

  3. #3
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    7,065

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    How about trying a .48 housing? You can always swap back. Super 70 are a mixed bad that I would not want to get into. Some are terribly laggy.
    Brent GREAT DEPRESSION RACING 1992 Duster 3.0T The Junkyard - MS II, OEM 10:1 -[I] Old - 11.5@125 22psi $90 [U]Stock[/U] 3.0 Junk Motor - 1 bar MAP [/I] 1994 Spirit 3.0T - 11.5@120 20 psi - Daily :eyebrows: Holset He351 -FT600 - 393whp 457ft/lb @18psi 1994 Spirit 3.0T a670 - He341, stock fuel, BEGI. Wife's into kid's project. 1990 Lebaron Coupe 2.2 TI/II non IC, a413 1990 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1993 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1994 Duster 3.0 A543 1981 Starlet KP61 Potential driver -- 1981 Starlet KP61 Parts -- 1983 Starlet KP61 Drag 2005 Durango Hemi Limited -- 1998 Dodge 12v 47re. AFC mods, No plate, Mack plug, Boost elbow -- 2011 Dodge 6.7 G56

  4. #4
    boostaholic Turbo Mopar Contributor
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Mannheim, Germany
    Posts
    1,491

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ondonti View Post
    How about trying a .48 housing? You can always swap back. Super 70 are a mixed bad that I would not want to get into. Some are terribly laggy.
    I'd have to get a .48 machined for the stg 2 wheel. How weird would that​ be?!

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Keito View Post
    If your mostly stock, you found the disadvantage.
    .
    Honestly, there's not much stock left on this car.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC][FONT=Comic Sans MS]'91 Shadow convertible 2.5 auto, three core RP IC, S60/.48 stg 1, ported two-piece intake/52mm TB, Menegon +1 swirl, 88 turbo cam, Venolias, Crower rods, TU deep sump pan, ported exhaust, 3" from SV to TP, Hughes TC, Peloquin diff, DSS L5 driveshafts, Shelgame cal, Koni struts/shocks. [/FONT]

  5. #5
    turbo addict Pat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Rockville, MD
    Posts
    3,801

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    I ran a 50 trim/stage III in a machined .48 housing on a 2.2 8v for a while and loved it for a street car. Never pushed the power limits, but at 18 psi, it felt great. I now have the same turbo set up on a healthy T3 in a Shadow. Looking forward to testing it at the track in the coming weeks, but so far, it's great. It's pulling great from 3500-6500.

    Quote Originally Posted by John B View Post
    I'd have to get a .48 machined for the stg 2 wheel. How weird would that​ be?!

    - - - Updated - - -



    Honestly, there's not much stock left on this car.

  6. #6
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    7,352

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    My GLH has a 2.5L with a T04E 50 trim with T04E compressor housing, stage 1 turbine wheel, and .48 turbine housing. Boost comes in at 1300RPM and Full 20psi comes in under 3000RPM.

    I'd advise keeping the T04E compressor side but go back to a stage turbine 1 wheel and .48 housing, they are cheap and plentiful.


    Last edited by tryingbe; 07-16-2013 at 11:10 AM.

  7. #7
    boostaholic Turbo Mopar Contributor
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Mannheim, Germany
    Posts
    1,491

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    Who would you recommend for machining the housing?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC][FONT=Comic Sans MS]'91 Shadow convertible 2.5 auto, three core RP IC, S60/.48 stg 1, ported two-piece intake/52mm TB, Menegon +1 swirl, 88 turbo cam, Venolias, Crower rods, TU deep sump pan, ported exhaust, 3" from SV to TP, Hughes TC, Peloquin diff, DSS L5 driveshafts, Shelgame cal, Koni struts/shocks. [/FONT]

  8. #8
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff contraption22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Havertown, PA
    Posts
    9,517

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    I think people are finding out that the .48 housing isn't as bad as everybody thinks it is for a 8V car.
    Mike Marra
    1986 Plymouth Horizon GLMF "The Contraption" < entertaining sponsorship offers
    Project Log:
    http://www.turbo-mopar.com/forums/showthread.php?69708-The-Contraption-2013-14&highlight=

  9. #9
    boostaholic Turbo Mopar Contributor
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Mannheim, Germany
    Posts
    1,491

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    I wonder if I can swap the turbo without removing the head? I ground reliefs around all the bolt bosses so they would be easier to get a wrench on, but still...
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC][FONT=Comic Sans MS]'91 Shadow convertible 2.5 auto, three core RP IC, S60/.48 stg 1, ported two-piece intake/52mm TB, Menegon +1 swirl, 88 turbo cam, Venolias, Crower rods, TU deep sump pan, ported exhaust, 3" from SV to TP, Hughes TC, Peloquin diff, DSS L5 driveshafts, Shelgame cal, Koni struts/shocks. [/FONT]

  10. #10
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Pickering, ontario
    Posts
    2,670

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    Quote Originally Posted by contraption22 View Post
    I think people are finding out that the .48 housing isn't as bad as everybody thinks it is for a 8V car.
    Not just finding it's not that bad, proving it too. I wouldn't go near the .63 housing for a streetable set up again.

  11. #11
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    7,352

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    My CSX has a turbo with a Stage II turbine wheel and .48 a/r turbine housing. Lots of top end but have no torque before 3400rpm...


  12. #12
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Vigo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    San Antonio,TX
    Posts
    10,798

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    I would think a tbi header and upgraded exhaust would almost totally make up for the spool change from stg1 to stg2.. i am suspicious of something else going on in that situation.

    Anyway, Yes you can get the turbo off without taking the head off. I did it to a shelby lancer about a month ago. It involves a lot of uncomfortable working positions. It's a lot easier if you take the k-frame out, but i didnt even do that, i left everything together. With the k-frame out it's borderline 'easy'.

    I cant say i told you so because my memory is so bad that im not certain, but i THINK i remember trying to say that that turbo was pointlessly large for someone who wasn't really trying to make 350+ hp.

    I would try getting a .48 housing machined and try that because it's not TOO expensive and it'll probably make a nice difference. If that doesnt work i would just go back to an s60/stg1/.48, which is still a 300hp turbo, so you should be able to run low-mid 12s before the turbo is your main bottleneck.

    Dont push the red button.You hear me?

  13. #13

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    I don't remember the specs on the turbo on my csxt but it had a FM stg1 ported head, ported exhaust mani and I think the turbo was a T04 with a 46trim compressor with a stg1 .63 exhaust housing with a 3in SV. It would hit full bost around 3.5k rpms and would start building boost in the mid to higher 2k rpm range. It has been many years since I had it and don't remember fully.

    Although it was a great turbo, I kinda wish I had done a super60 because thats a great turbo that bolts right on like stock and is perfect for a DD.

  14. #14
    Buy my stuff!!!!!!!!!!! :O) Turbo Mopar Vendor turbovanmanČ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Abbotsford, BC
    Posts
    44,167

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    TU can machine a housing, turbo shops or I can get it done for you but if you hate the lag, I'd keep the turbo and put a .48 housing on.

    What cam are you running? Try advancing the cam, that helps tons with lag.
    1989 FWD Turbo Caravan-2.5 TIII, GT35R, auto, a/c, cruise, pwr windows/locks, fully loaded with interior and ran with full exhaust. RETIRED FOR A FEW YEARS! 12.57@104 :O)
    1984 Chev Getaway van, 6.2 Diesel with a remote mounted turbo setup burning WMO-For sale.
    2003 GSW 2.0L TDI, auto, fully loaded, modified, 360K-wife's.
    2004 GSW TDI, 5 speed, fully loaded, modified.

    Aurora ignition wires for sale. Link to info

    Super60 roller cams or custom/billet cams. Link to info

  15. #15

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    Quote Originally Posted by JuXsA View Post
    I don't remember the specs on the turbo on my csxt but it had a FM stg1 ported head, ported exhaust mani and I think the turbo was a T04 with a 46trim compressor with a stg1 .63 exhaust housing with a 3in SV. It would hit full bost around 3.5k rpms and would start building boost in the mid to higher 2k rpm range. It has been many years since I had it and don't remember fully.

    Although it was a great turbo, I kinda wish I had done a super60 because thats a great turbo that bolts right on like stock and is perfect for a DD.
    Same setup I have now with same kind of spool rpms...it must be the st2 trubine killing him.?...the turbine is the same between .63 and .48.....well the stg1 i anyhow..isnt the stg2 just and sligthly different angle (for lack of better word). You can use stock T2 turbine IF you machine down the compressor wheel .250, there is plenty of meat.

  16. #16
    Buy my stuff!!!!!!!!!!! :O) Turbo Mopar Vendor turbovanmanČ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Abbotsford, BC
    Posts
    44,167

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    Quote Originally Posted by trannybuster View Post
    Same setup I have now with same kind of spool rpms...it must be the st2 trubine killing him.?...the turbine is the same between .63 and .48.....well the stg1 i anyhow..isnt the stg2 just and sligthly different angle (for lack of better word). You can use stock T2 turbine IF you machine down the compressor wheel .250, there is plenty of meat.
    Why would you machine down a stage II wheel? that's a waste plus they bigger not just in diameter. If you really want to machine anything, either machine a .48 housing or swap out to a stage I turbine wheel and .48 housing.
    1989 FWD Turbo Caravan-2.5 TIII, GT35R, auto, a/c, cruise, pwr windows/locks, fully loaded with interior and ran with full exhaust. RETIRED FOR A FEW YEARS! 12.57@104 :O)
    1984 Chev Getaway van, 6.2 Diesel with a remote mounted turbo setup burning WMO-For sale.
    2003 GSW 2.0L TDI, auto, fully loaded, modified, 360K-wife's.
    2004 GSW TDI, 5 speed, fully loaded, modified.

    Aurora ignition wires for sale. Link to info

    Super60 roller cams or custom/billet cams. Link to info

  17. #17

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    Quote Originally Posted by trannybuster View Post
    Same setup I have now with same kind of spool rpms...it must be the st2 trubine killing him.?...the turbine is the same between .63 and .48.....well the stg1 i anyhow..isnt the stg2 just and sligthly different angle (for lack of better word). You can use stock T2 turbine IF you machine down the compressor wheel .250, there is plenty of meat.
    Yeah, my money is on the Stg2 turbine. The only reason to not go with a stg1 is if you are using a 16v head and can flow mad air, or its an all out all top end drag car and not a daily driver. The turbo you have and what I had is great for a DD but I still wish I had gone with a super 60 for the plug and play of it

  18. #18
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    MPLS, MN
    Posts
    3,591

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    I just sold a 2.2 with true s-60 in 86 GLHT. Heavily ported TBI header, head, intake manifold, upgraded swingvalve, cam, much tighter swish, etc. I had so much bottom end, I needed to kill some of it, so new owner is going with larger turbo and probably a bit more duration camshaft. Too much power down low isn't good either if you can't hook it up.
    Mark Christofferson's fathers GLHT was eating stock TII turbos about one per year, due to overspinning them, even though boost was set at low 15-16 PSI. All the on and off throttle probably didn't help either. Finally went with s-46 in TO4B (FM style housing) w/stage 1 .63 housing and 3" TU swingvalve. Throttle response is critical in autocross car. We didn't lose that much low end punch going with that turbo. IMO, that would have been an excellent choice for you John. Bigger than a s-60 or s-70, smaller than your current turbo, and close to a bolt in.
    Todd

  19. #19
    Rhymes with tortoise. Turbo Mopar Staff cordes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Tuscola, IL
    Posts
    21,468

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    Where are you achieving min and max boost right now? What is max boost right now? How much tuning have you done to work on the the spool etc.?

  20. #20
    boostaholic Turbo Mopar Contributor
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Mannheim, Germany
    Posts
    1,491

    Re: Should have stayed with the Super 60...

    Quote Originally Posted by 4 l-bodies View Post
    I had so much bottom end, I needed to kill some of it,
    Todd
    Thanks for the tip. I have the .91 gear set and a Peloquin dif, so I can handle a lot of low end grunt better than some setups. I was considering the 46 trim, but when I went for the S50/stg 2/.63, conventional wisdom at that time was that it was about optimum for a 2.5. Gary Donovan told me years ago that many make the mistake of going too big on a street turbo and that he would use a Super 60 if he was building a street car. Shoulda listened...
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC][FONT=Comic Sans MS]'91 Shadow convertible 2.5 auto, three core RP IC, S60/.48 stg 1, ported two-piece intake/52mm TB, Menegon +1 swirl, 88 turbo cam, Venolias, Crower rods, TU deep sump pan, ported exhaust, 3" from SV to TP, Hughes TC, Peloquin diff, DSS L5 driveshafts, Shelgame cal, Koni struts/shocks. [/FONT]

Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-04-2014, 09:30 PM
  2. For Sale 1990 LeBaron Convertible Super Clean Super Low Miles
    By rbrthrly900 in forum Cars
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-15-2012, 10:49 AM
  3. Got the car to start, But its running super super rich
    By 87yorker in forum "I need help!"
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-21-2009, 02:54 PM
  4. need super 60 wheels? maybe super 70 parts?
    By turbovanpilot in forum Turbos & Intercoolers!
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-11-2008, 06:50 AM
  5. super 60 ?
    By lancer117 in forum Turbos & Intercoolers!
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-10-2007, 10:13 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •