Page 21 of 30 FirstFirst ... 11171819202122232425 ... LastLast
Results 401 to 420 of 596

Thread: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

  1. #401
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Force Fed Mopar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville/Spartanburg SC area
    Posts
    7,559

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    I'll look it over again today, I don't remember any pistons being broke, but didn't look that close the other day.

    I don't think it's pieces of a hammer.
    Rob M.
    '89 Turbo GTC

    2.5 TIII stroker, 568 w/ OBX and 3.77 FD

  2. #402
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Force Fed Mopar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville/Spartanburg SC area
    Posts
    7,559

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Plastic bits are wrist pin buttons.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20150209_101504.jpg 
Views:	110 
Size:	1.31 MB 
ID:	53734

    That's why it looked like a broken skirt in the pic, because the buttons had fallen apart and allowed the wrist pin to slide over.
    Rob M.
    '89 Turbo GTC

    2.5 TIII stroker, 568 w/ OBX and 3.77 FD

  3. #403
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Force Fed Mopar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville/Spartanburg SC area
    Posts
    7,559

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Thinking I'm gonna buy a set of 10:1 SOHC Diamante pistons to go back in it. Rock auto has a set of DNJ pistons for about 100 bucks. Finish tearing it down to the block and clean it up so I can repaint it, and then build it back right. Crank and bearings look great still.
    Rob M.
    '89 Turbo GTC

    2.5 TIII stroker, 568 w/ OBX and 3.77 FD

  4. #404
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Force Fed Mopar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville/Spartanburg SC area
    Posts
    7,559

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Or maybe I'll just spring for some custom forged pistons. I dunno yet lol. See what kind of money I can come up with in the next month or so.
    Rob M.
    '89 Turbo GTC

    2.5 TIII stroker, 568 w/ OBX and 3.77 FD

  5. #405
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Hazelwood, MO
    Posts
    6,566

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Holy crap! What the hell were they thinking? There's no reason for those pistons to need Teflon pin buttons. Good think you caught this before running it more! That would have eventually trashed the block.

  6. #406
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Force Fed Mopar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville/Spartanburg SC area
    Posts
    7,559

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Yeap. There's no grooves for pin locks, and the pins are full floating, so I guess this was their only option? Really not sure why they used a DOHC piston/bottom end anyway, seems like it would have been just as easy to buy a SOHC Diamante engine as a DOHC version... I wonder if they were press fit originally and they honed them to be full floating.

    Rods do look very clean and like they may have had work done on them. They do have ARP bolts in them.
    Rob M.
    '89 Turbo GTC

    2.5 TIII stroker, 568 w/ OBX and 3.77 FD

  7. #407
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    7,065

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Quote Originally Posted by Force Fed Mopar View Post
    Yeap. There's no grooves for pin locks, and the pins are full floating, so I guess this was their only option? Really not sure why they used a DOHC piston/bottom end anyway, seems like it would have been just as easy to buy a SOHC Diamante engine as a DOHC version... I wonder if they were press fit originally and they honed them to be full floating.

    Rods do look very clean and like they may have had work done on them. They do have ARP bolts in them.
    BTW, maybe rick had those rods done first while waiting for pistons that...never arrived or were never actually ordered. When you don't do your own work or inspect what work was performed you can get seriously taken advantage of.
    -----
    You do have a broken skirt in those pictures, My 10:1 broke the skirt in the same place. I just threw it back together after replacing the crankshaft. I bent a crankshaft so I figured that I had some interference. Maybe there is a design problem with 10:1 pistons and the cast crank. Leftover piece was sitting in the oil pan. Just chips off the bottom of one side.

    No reason to have ARP bolts in stock rods, they don't need them plus you still have a stock cast crankshaft. Those rods were machined to be floating. I asked my machine shop to bush my reconditioned rods for floating when I got my forged pistons and they said it would be better to use that money to fully balance the rotating assembly and just press the rods on.

    I would go for a set of forged flattops if you can afford them and get ring heights set properly for a large dose of nitrous (not like the OEM ring locations). . Get the biggest oversize you can find rings for if your machine shops will do large overbores for cheap. Errybody does 3.1 builds for double and triple the HP this is at. Your rods are ready for floating pins so proper pistons will work together with your rods.

    Assuming you have a set of stock rods that are press fit.....
    If you go with rockauto 10:1's then I would run insane large ring gaps. The OEM 10:1's are much stronger than the 8.85/8.9's because they don't have that massive intake valve relief near the ringland. I don't know about the aftermarket stuff out there. OEM 10:1's with big gaps bent my crankshaft and all they suffered was a chipped skirt. 8.85/8.9's would have checked out long before. I would order the largest available oversize for aftermarket cast pistons.

    -------
    If you have forged pistons and kill a rod for some reason, then you would also have the proper setup to bother upgrading your rods to some of the cheap options out there.
    Last edited by Ondonti; 02-10-2015 at 07:49 AM.
    Brent GREAT DEPRESSION RACING 1992 Duster 3.0T The Junkyard - MS II, OEM 10:1 -[I] Old - 11.5@125 22psi $90 [U]Stock[/U] 3.0 Junk Motor - 1 bar MAP [/I] 1994 Spirit 3.0T - 11.5@120 20 psi - Daily :eyebrows: Holset He351 -FT600 - 393whp 457ft/lb @18psi 1994 Spirit 3.0T a670 - He341, stock fuel, BEGI. Wife's into kid's project. 1990 Lebaron Coupe 2.2 TI/II non IC, a413 1990 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1993 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1994 Duster 3.0 A543 1981 Starlet KP61 Potential driver -- 1981 Starlet KP61 Parts -- 1983 Starlet KP61 Drag 2005 Durango Hemi Limited -- 1998 Dodge 12v 47re. AFC mods, No plate, Mack plug, Boost elbow -- 2011 Dodge 6.7 G56

  8. #408
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Force Fed Mopar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville/Spartanburg SC area
    Posts
    7,559

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    That's what I was thinking of doing, was just run stock 10:1 SOHC pistons with large gaps, like .035 or so. Forged would be nice insurance, just costs $500 or so more.

    If I go forged I'll move the compression up to 11:1 or so. Nobody I found has an off-the-shelf SOHC piston, so it'll be a custom forging anyway. We'll see how my money goes in the next few weeks...
    Rob M.
    '89 Turbo GTC

    2.5 TIII stroker, 568 w/ OBX and 3.77 FD

  9. #409
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    7,065

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Quote Originally Posted by Force Fed Mopar View Post
    That's what I was thinking of doing, was just run stock 10:1 SOHC pistons with large gaps, like .035 or so. Forged would be nice insurance, just costs $500 or so more.

    If I go forged I'll move the compression up to 11:1 or so. Nobody I found has an off-the-shelf SOHC piston, so it'll be a custom forging anyway. We'll see how my money goes in the next few weeks...
    Remember the rod problem, you need some stock press fit rods to use stock pistons. I would go high 20's and then a few thou bigger on 2nd rings for nitrous. .025 top took a beating on a 10:1 stocker.
    Brent GREAT DEPRESSION RACING 1992 Duster 3.0T The Junkyard - MS II, OEM 10:1 -[I] Old - 11.5@125 22psi $90 [U]Stock[/U] 3.0 Junk Motor - 1 bar MAP [/I] 1994 Spirit 3.0T - 11.5@120 20 psi - Daily :eyebrows: Holset He351 -FT600 - 393whp 457ft/lb @18psi 1994 Spirit 3.0T a670 - He341, stock fuel, BEGI. Wife's into kid's project. 1990 Lebaron Coupe 2.2 TI/II non IC, a413 1990 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1993 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1994 Duster 3.0 A543 1981 Starlet KP61 Potential driver -- 1981 Starlet KP61 Parts -- 1983 Starlet KP61 Drag 2005 Durango Hemi Limited -- 1998 Dodge 12v 47re. AFC mods, No plate, Mack plug, Boost elbow -- 2011 Dodge 6.7 G56

  10. #410
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Squamish BC
    Posts
    3,618

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    As a friend to friend don't run big globs of Nos on cast pistons as the higher silicon % in them makes them stronger to cylinder pressure but at the cost being weaker to nitrous detonation ring they shatter like glass leaving the rod ends to poke windows in the block.

  11. #411
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Force Fed Mopar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville/Spartanburg SC area
    Posts
    7,559

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Going to have to re-bore it, wrist pins got the cyl walls

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20150210_232757.jpg 
Views:	90 
Size:	999.8 KB 
ID:	53752Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20150210_232742.jpg 
Views:	88 
Size:	974.0 KB 
ID:	53753

    And one of the skirts is broke

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20150210_232619.jpg 
Views:	88 
Size:	1.43 MB 
ID:	53750Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20150210_232604.jpg 
Views:	77 
Size:	1.38 MB 
ID:	53751

    I may just end up throwing some OEM 10:1's in it for now to get it up and running and get it tuned on motor this year. Tax money is mostly already allotted to other stuff I have another short block I can get rods from. Actually could use the whole block if this one is too scarred to save. Thought about doing so anyway just to go back to a Chrysler block, since this Mitsu one isn't anything special anyway...may end up doing so.

    Actually, for that matter I have a complete running engine I could drop in, just to get it going again... that way I could spend money now on getting the trans fixed, which is just as important... decisions decisions
    Rob M.
    '89 Turbo GTC

    2.5 TIII stroker, 568 w/ OBX and 3.77 FD

  12. #412
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Actually, for that matter I have a complete running engine I could drop in, just to get it going again... that way I could spend money now on getting the trans fixed, which is just as important... decisions decisions
    I like that idea. Throwing money down a rat hole into an engine that is nothing special but an odd mis match cobble job of parts seems like a waste IMO.
    1994 Shadow Sedan. 2.2 N/A, A568 400,000 miles. "the science experiment"
    1987 Shelby CSX #418. Long term rebuild and restore ?

  13. #413
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Hazelwood, MO
    Posts
    6,566

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Man, whoever assembled that engine was smoking crack or something! I can't believe what I'm seeing! Seriously. These are all mistakes and moves that a totally oblivious person, or totally careless person would do when assembling the engine! It really makes you wonder about the shop that did the work. It really actually upsets me that somebody would let that go out the door!

  14. #414
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Vigo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    San Antonio,TX
    Posts
    10,798

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    I would just put the stock engine you have in it and focus on the trans. You can always build this one back up at your leisure, and as said i see no huge advantage to getting it back up and running on this exact engine since it doesn't seem to have any huge advantages over an engine you already know runs right.

    Dont push the red button.You hear me?

  15. #415
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Squamish BC
    Posts
    3,618

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Quote Originally Posted by Vigo View Post
    I would just put the stock engine you have in it and focus on the trans. You can always build this one back up at your leisure, and as said i see no huge advantage to getting it back up and running on this exact engine since it doesn't seem to have any huge advantages over an engine you already know runs right.
    i have to agree it the time best spent ver cost

  16. #416
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    7,065

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Stock engine with big gaps is fine.

    I don't understand why you wouldn't want the biggest overbore you can get, especially if you have cylinder scarring. 1000whp has been achieved with near .100 overbores. Big overbores are the standard build for anyone making big power.

    Get the biggest 10:1 pistons they sell if you are going stock. If you are going custom, go with something near .080-.100 overbore that has a good ringpack available. I went .096" for 3.13 liters of displacement.
    You are thinking about tossing the block so you don't even have the excuse of trying to save cylinder material for future rebuilds. They sell cylinder liners for 6g72's if you ever needed one and the rest of the millions of engines on the road disappeared.

    If you want to go really cheap, just keep the current pistons and put the proper stock press fit rods in. Totally acceptable but boring. I wouldn't even sweat that poor cylinder while you are working out transmission issues.
    Brent GREAT DEPRESSION RACING 1992 Duster 3.0T The Junkyard - MS II, OEM 10:1 -[I] Old - 11.5@125 22psi $90 [U]Stock[/U] 3.0 Junk Motor - 1 bar MAP [/I] 1994 Spirit 3.0T - 11.5@120 20 psi - Daily :eyebrows: Holset He351 -FT600 - 393whp 457ft/lb @18psi 1994 Spirit 3.0T a670 - He341, stock fuel, BEGI. Wife's into kid's project. 1990 Lebaron Coupe 2.2 TI/II non IC, a413 1990 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1993 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1994 Duster 3.0 A543 1981 Starlet KP61 Potential driver -- 1981 Starlet KP61 Parts -- 1983 Starlet KP61 Drag 2005 Durango Hemi Limited -- 1998 Dodge 12v 47re. AFC mods, No plate, Mack plug, Boost elbow -- 2011 Dodge 6.7 G56

  17. #417
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Force Fed Mopar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville/Spartanburg SC area
    Posts
    7,559

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Because boring really doesn't gain that much. I'd rather not use the current pistons since they are totally mismatched to the SOHC heads. I suppose a .100 over bore might make a noticeable difference, when I go forged I'll consider it. Generally I like to use as close to stock bore as I can to maintain as much cylinder rigidity, although I have no problem with a .030-.040 overbore.

    I keep changing my mind, but I'm pretty certain at this point that I'm just gonna order some stock bore 10:1 pistons and throw them in the Chrysler short block I have sitting around doing nothing. It has a fresh crank and rings in it, just needs honing again and clean up the crank nose, as it's been sitting. Or I could use the crank out of the Diamante block, it's clean and fresh. Not sure if it's any better than the Chrysler crank.
    Rob M.
    '89 Turbo GTC

    2.5 TIII stroker, 568 w/ OBX and 3.77 FD

  18. #418
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Vigo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    San Antonio,TX
    Posts
    10,798

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Same motor that was running in that 86 daytona? Or you sold that? I like the cheap and fast route because honestly making it more complicated then it needs to be is the whole reason this car has sat for what, most of a decade? Just get it running and upgrade from there.

    Dont push the red button.You hear me?

  19. #419
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    7,065

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Quote Originally Posted by Force Fed Mopar View Post
    Because boring really doesn't gain that much. I'd rather not use the current pistons since they are totally mismatched to the SOHC heads. I suppose a .100 over bore might make a noticeable difference, when I go forged I'll consider it. Generally I like to use as close to stock bore as I can to maintain as much cylinder rigidity, although I have no problem with a .030-.040 overbore.

    I keep changing my mind, but I'm pretty certain at this point that I'm just gonna order some stock bore 10:1 pistons and throw them in the Chrysler short block I have sitting around doing nothing. It has a fresh crank and rings in it, just needs honing again and clean up the crank nose, as it's been sitting. Or I could use the crank out of the Diamante block, it's clean and fresh. Not sure if it's any better than the Chrysler crank.
    Well you don't need to even consider cylinder rigidity at .100 overbore because its one of the strongest blocks in existence cylinder wise. I have only heard of one block that was even partial filled EVER (guy mentioned below). Consider the fact that they really don't sell 6g72 shortblocks that are not near .100 overbore for any high HP applications. The higher HP rated shortblocks are all large overbores and sometimes with a stroker crank added in.

    One person did once consider running a .200" overbore with sleeves but I think it was too much machine work. That was for a 2000hp setup. He still runs a huge overbore in his even weaker 6g74 block.

    You will be putting down 1/3 the HP of what people expect those big overbores to handle.
    Brent GREAT DEPRESSION RACING 1992 Duster 3.0T The Junkyard - MS II, OEM 10:1 -[I] Old - 11.5@125 22psi $90 [U]Stock[/U] 3.0 Junk Motor - 1 bar MAP [/I] 1994 Spirit 3.0T - 11.5@120 20 psi - Daily :eyebrows: Holset He351 -FT600 - 393whp 457ft/lb @18psi 1994 Spirit 3.0T a670 - He341, stock fuel, BEGI. Wife's into kid's project. 1990 Lebaron Coupe 2.2 TI/II non IC, a413 1990 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1993 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1994 Duster 3.0 A543 1981 Starlet KP61 Potential driver -- 1981 Starlet KP61 Parts -- 1983 Starlet KP61 Drag 2005 Durango Hemi Limited -- 1998 Dodge 12v 47re. AFC mods, No plate, Mack plug, Boost elbow -- 2011 Dodge 6.7 G56

  20. #420
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Force Fed Mopar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville/Spartanburg SC area
    Posts
    7,559

    Re: Project LookOwt: Saving a piece of 3.0 history

    Quote Originally Posted by Vigo View Post
    Same motor that was running in that 86 daytona? Or you sold that? I like the cheap and fast route because honestly making it more complicated then it needs to be is the whole reason this car has sat for what, most of a decade? Just get it running and upgrade from there.
    Yeap same one. Runs on all 6 now though lol.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ondonti View Post
    Well you don't need to even consider cylinder rigidity at .100 overbore because its one of the strongest blocks in existence cylinder wise. I have only heard of one block that was even partial filled EVER (guy mentioned below). Consider the fact that they really don't sell 6g72 shortblocks that are not near .100 overbore for any high HP applications. The higher HP rated shortblocks are all large overbores and sometimes with a stroker crank added in.

    One person did once consider running a .200" overbore with sleeves but I think it was too much machine work. That was for a 2000hp setup. He still runs a huge overbore in his even weaker 6g74 block.

    You will be putting down 1/3 the HP of what people expect those big overbores to handle.
    Well that's good to know. I'll do that when I get serious and go forged.
    Rob M.
    '89 Turbo GTC

    2.5 TIII stroker, 568 w/ OBX and 3.77 FD

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •