Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: 2.4 vs 2.4

  1. #1

    2.4 vs 2.4

    96+ NA vs SRT-4 other then the obvious what's the diference. like is the SRT-4 block stronger then the old na. is the cylinder walls thicker on the SRT. why the small exhaust valves and ports, why the long threaded spark plugs, it makes for less plug choises and what horse power can be had out of the stock valve srt head. if you are just guessing please don't respond I done that already. plus if you got more info on ether that would help too.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff contraption22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Havertown, PA
    Posts
    9,517

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    Just an FYI, it's more of a year break than a turbo vs non-turbo. The changes were made to pretty much all the '03-up 2.4's.

    Here is an article that shows many of the disticntions. But doesn't answer any of the "Why's".

    http://www.enginebuildermag.com/Arti...ysler_24l.aspx
    Mike Marra
    1986 Plymouth Horizon GLMF "The Contraption" < entertaining sponsorship offers
    Project Log:
    http://www.turbo-mopar.com/forums/showthread.php?69708-The-Contraption-2013-14&highlight=

  3. #3

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    Good stuff to know, thanks Mike

  4. #4
    See me ride out of the sunset... Turbo Mopar Staff BadAssPerformance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicagoland!
    Posts
    27,701

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    +1 to Mike's link good info

    As for the "why" I heard they went with smaller valves cuz the reshaped ports game them more flow so they didnt need as big of a valve to get the CFM they wanted.

    Stock vs. stock the turbo head will outflow N/A... ported, they can both be cut similar to flow insane amounts.

    JT
    SDAC Director
    SDAC-Chicago President
    JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
    87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
    87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph

    www.badassperformance.com
    Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
    Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!

    Support SDAC! Join Today!
    "I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
    Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.

  5. #5

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    thanks JT. I have both engines and needed to decide what direction to go.

  6. #6
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff dodgeshadowchik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Leaving on a Jet Plane
    Posts
    1,803

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    Quote Originally Posted by BadAssPerformance View Post
    +1 to Mike's link good info

    As for the "why" I heard they went with smaller valves cuz the reshaped ports game them more flow so they didnt need as big of a valve to get the CFM they wanted.

    Stock vs. stock the turbo head will outflow N/A... ported, they can both be cut similar to flow insane amounts.
    It's probably similar with what they did with the 1g dsm head vs. the 2g head. The 2g has smaller ports but flowed better than the 1g.

    +2 on the link... great info!

    "I'll give you anything you'll ever need and I'll find a way to turn you into a monster."

  7. #7
    See me ride out of the sunset... Turbo Mopar Staff BadAssPerformance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicagoland!
    Posts
    27,701

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    Quote Originally Posted by ohiorob View Post
    thanks JT. I have both engines and needed to decide what direction to go.
    After the last oil pump failure in my first 2.4L I was having the same mental battle, except I didnt have either in hand, LOL. I ended up with the NA motor, mainly because I already had a head with work done too it that survived OK, and the SRT bottom ends are like gold for something I would only use the block and crank out of...

    JT
    SDAC Director
    SDAC-Chicago President
    JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
    87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
    87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph

    www.badassperformance.com
    Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
    Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!

    Support SDAC! Join Today!
    "I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
    Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.

  8. #8
    The moderately moderate moderator Turbo Mopar Staff
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Akron, Ohio
    Posts
    6,870

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    Rob, I'll take the junk you don't want.....LOL!
    Bryan
    86 GLHS #161, 2016 Impala
    SDAC National Member, SDAC Buckeye Chapter Member

    A man has got to know his limitations.....

  9. #9
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Fort Wayne, IN
    Posts
    2,642

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    Turbo block has ports for oil and coolant feed/return. Also has the oil squirters. That would be worth it IMO just to clean things up for routing. But if you are building something from scratch you can get a complete long block 2.4 here for $130!

    Also one really huge benefit is the bosses to bolt on the jack shaft for equal length shafts on the newer block.

  10. #10
    See me ride out of the sunset... Turbo Mopar Staff BadAssPerformance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicagoland!
    Posts
    27,701

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    Quote Originally Posted by Mopar318 View Post
    Also has the oil squirters.
    I heard those are only a benefit for stock pistons?

    But if you are building something from scratch you can get a complete long block 2.4 here for $130!
    NA or SRT? Where?

    JT
    SDAC Director
    SDAC-Chicago President
    JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
    87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
    87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph

    www.badassperformance.com
    Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
    Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!

    Support SDAC! Join Today!
    "I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
    Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.

  11. #11
    Supporting Member Turbo Mopar Contributor zin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    ca
    Posts
    4,479

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    Squirters pull heat out of the piston dome maintaining the strength of the material, cast or forged, so they can help any piston last longer.

    Mike
    "The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." - Patrick Henry

    Bad laws are the worst sort of tyranny.
    - Edmund Burke

  12. #12
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Fort Wayne, IN
    Posts
    2,642

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    Quote Originally Posted by BadAssPerformance View Post
    I heard those are only a benefit for stock pistons?



    NA or SRT? Where?
    Sorry, its actually $149.99. I think it went up a few bucks.

    http://www.takeapart.biz/pricing.html

    That is for any 4 cylinder, and there are probally about ten 2.4 cars right now. Lots of vans, status's, and PT's with the NGC stuff. I have never seen a turbo 2.4 there yet, but always keeping an eye out. If there is its mine! If you want to make a trip over sometime I can help pull some engines.

  13. #13
    Buy my stuff!!!!!!!!!!! :O) Turbo Mopar Vendor turbovanmanČ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Abbotsford, BC
    Posts
    44,167

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    Awesome article.

    Wonder if the RWD blocks fit FWD and why did they put the pistons so far down the hole?
    1989 FWD Turbo Caravan-2.5 TIII, GT35R, auto, a/c, cruise, pwr windows/locks, fully loaded with interior and ran with full exhaust. RETIRED FOR A FEW YEARS! 12.57@104 :O)
    1984 Chev Getaway van, 6.2 Diesel with a remote mounted turbo setup burning WMO-For sale.
    2003 GSW 2.0L TDI, auto, fully loaded, modified, 360K-wife's.
    2004 GSW TDI, 5 speed, fully loaded, modified.

    Aurora ignition wires for sale. Link to info

    Super60 roller cams or custom/billet cams. Link to info

  14. #14
    Garrett booster
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    81

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    I also have been wondering if there was an advantage to the newer block? With more PT's hitting the yards the newer 2.4 is now easy for me to obtain but so far I have only rob them of their lifters. If I could find a good reason to go with the newer 2.4 I would pull one.

  15. #15
    See me ride out of the sunset... Turbo Mopar Staff BadAssPerformance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicagoland!
    Posts
    27,701

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    Quote Originally Posted by coronet2fast View Post
    I also have been wondering if there was an advantage to the newer block? With more PT's hitting the yards the newer 2.4 is now easy for me to obtain but so far I have only rob them of their lifters. If I could find a good reason to go with the newer 2.4 I would pull one.
    Newer NA blocks? not sure if much better than older NA blocks?

    JT
    SDAC Director
    SDAC-Chicago President
    JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
    87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
    87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph

    www.badassperformance.com
    Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
    Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!

    Support SDAC! Join Today!
    "I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
    Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.

  16. #16
    Garrett booster
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    81

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    Yeah newer NA. Figured I would run the older block since it would be easier to find heads for them and not have to worry about fitment.

  17. #17
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    2,793

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    The newer n/a 2.4 will let you run the srt head with no modifications, not sure how hard it is to add the squirters to it.

  18. #18
    Garrett booster
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    windsor ,ont
    Posts
    108

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    Big power 2.4s are actually removing the squirters. I believe for clearance and oil control issues.

  19. #19
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff contraption22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Havertown, PA
    Posts
    9,517

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    I don't see the need for squirters in a true performance or race engine. People go through some effort to control windage, and keep oil off the rotating assembly.
    Mike Marra
    1986 Plymouth Horizon GLMF "The Contraption" < entertaining sponsorship offers
    Project Log:
    http://www.turbo-mopar.com/forums/showthread.php?69708-The-Contraption-2013-14&highlight=

  20. #20

    Re: 2.4 vs 2.4

    Quote Originally Posted by contraption22 View Post
    I don't see the need for squirters in a true performance or race engine. People go through some effort to control windage, and keep oil off the rotating assembly.
    My thoughts exactly. I may go with the smaller oil pump too. I don't need 90 psi of oil pressure.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •