I think when you start saying how something is more reliable blah blah based on your opinion then you start molding the attitude in a way that you end up not appreciating.
Is it really that interesting that a 3.0 that stayed the same for 14 years eventually made a lot less power then the motor that Dodge tried their best to improve? And when all the upgrades needed to go well beyond what dodge pulled off on their own v6 are readily available, its not a fair comparison to take the most modern of something against the most decrepit opponent.
Obviously there is no replacement for displacement, but a running 3.0 setup can always be upgraded to a 3.5 or 3.8 mitsu (which are direct replacements of the 3.0, just like the 3.8 replaces the 3.3), both of which outclass the 3.3/3.8 chryco by miles, even though mitsu never tried to make power out of them.
I find it silly for Adam to talk about how hard something is to work on when the actual level of difficulty he is talking about is very easy for him. People who can't change a timing belt really can't handle a 4 or 6 cylinder anything at high performance levels, and therefore the inability of those people to do something really has no value for an experienced person making a decision.
I still see no actual reason to upgrade the displacement for myself, all it means is less boost to make the same power, and neither way can I pass tech inspection.
I don't think an n/a 3.8L really stands a chance against a few of the n/a 3.0's being built right now though...or a few that have already been built.
What do these top model motors actually put down? We have seen over 220whp from Sunmind's mild cam 3.0, mild in that its similar to the really mild crower people are running.
Lets also note that the 3.0 was making 160hp in 1991 in the diamante platform with 2 valves heads. It took the 3.3L 10 years to jump ahead of that #, and 1998 for the 3.8L. Sad? Do I need to mention that the mitsu 3.5L was making 215hp in 1993 and the 3.8L waited until 2001. Then the 3.8L mitsu makes 265hp 260ft/lb and mitsubishi does NOT try to make power out of it because its in a FWD car, but with boltons can do over 300whp n/a and 4 figures turbo. You can get those heads to flow over 350 cfms. Megasquirt ain't that hard, that that automatically pumps up the power levels of any heavily hampered motor out there. I also like the idea of being able to run 2 intake cam profiles.
Or we could leave the topic alone and just congratulate the person on a fun project like I prefer to do until someone bashes.
If 16v people did this to 8 valve people every step of the way, it would get pretty annoying right? We know 16v's is superior but that doesn't mean its what the owner wants. Power would be easier to attain with the best motor ever, but we can't all have LS1's wink. I would enjoy a 3.8L 12 valve motor, just to say I did it, but If I had a 3.8L motor, I would be a fool to not use it as is. I would consider doing it with a 3.5L because they are throwaways.
You step into the import world and you hear a little too much about 2jz this and RB26 that, when there are a lot of exciting platforms to play with out there. Same thing goes for domestics. SBC this, SBF that.
Any opinion I have about a what could happen is really just an opportunity for someone to prove the point one way or the other. I preferred to get it done rather then talk about it. Adam said over AIM that he needs motivation so I need to haze him a bit. Dude with the turbo 3.3 could have laid it on the line but I figure his 3.3 is a chump.
I don't know if this omni ever ran so he could be a chump car too.