Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 43

Thread: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

  1. #21
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Quote Originally Posted by BadAssPerformance View Post
    I wish there was a way! Its hard to do that to heat treated steel.
    So when you gonna fire up the forge, cnc and make us some new gears then ? It just kills me every time I think about how much stuff new venture made for everyone and our transmissions are such oddball things compared to everyone else.

    Quote Originally Posted by shackwrrr View Post
    you can reshape them with a small file, Just make them pointy again and they will be good. No need to add material.
    2nd gear was the worst just from all the mashed metal burr's that were formed up top. I took a dremel with a sanding drum and gently whizzed the worst of the offending crap off but didnt want to go much further. I'll try the file idea tommorrow though. My spare parts 523 will be giving up its selector rings to the cause though, they were all in much better shape. I'm thinking newer/better/more pointy-points will mesh better with the more rounded over points than trying to mesh two semi rounded over spinning metal objects.

  2. #22
    See me ride out of the sunset... Turbo Mopar Staff BadAssPerformance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicagoland!
    Posts
    27,701

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Yeah we got screwed, LOL...

    Wonder if the dog teeth can just be "sharpened" ?

    JT
    SDAC Director
    SDAC-Chicago President
    JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
    87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
    87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph

    www.badassperformance.com
    Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
    Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!

    Support SDAC! Join Today!
    "I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
    Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.

  3. #23
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Unrelated to the current rebuilding process. 2-3-4-5 in my DD have been 'notchy' when its very cold outside and yesterday 5th wouldnt even work So I took the end cover off to see if there was anything outwardly wrong. Expected to find a mess inside there but quite the opposite... Didnt go any further than 5th since there wasnt much to see further in. All original 255,000 miles
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 132.jpg 
Views:	99 
Size:	158.1 KB 
ID:	27807Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 137.jpg 
Views:	106 
Size:	501.0 KB 
ID:	27806Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 134.jpg 
Views:	105 
Size:	357.4 KB 
ID:	27805Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 136.jpg 
Views:	110 
Size:	510.4 KB 
ID:	27804

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 139.jpg 
Views:	113 
Size:	501.3 KB 
ID:	27803Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 133.jpg 
Views:	110 
Size:	493.5 KB 
ID:	27802Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 135.jpg 
Views:	109 
Size:	289.4 KB 
ID:	27801Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 140.jpg 
Views:	111 
Size:	310.9 KB 
ID:	27808

    Found a shifter adjustment lock pin so tomorrow I'll readjust the crossover cable.

  4. #24
    See me ride out of the sunset... Turbo Mopar Staff BadAssPerformance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicagoland!
    Posts
    27,701

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    255k, wow.. not too bad there.

    As for notchy shifting, bushings OK? What oil is in it? If it gets better once its warm, could be an oil issue?

    JT
    SDAC Director
    SDAC-Chicago President
    JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
    87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
    87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph

    www.badassperformance.com
    Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
    Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!

    Support SDAC! Join Today!
    "I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
    Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.

  5. #25
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Its a mixture of poly and factory bushings. Castrol 5w30, when its warm outside everything is ok.

  6. #26
    See me ride out of the sunset... Turbo Mopar Staff BadAssPerformance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicagoland!
    Posts
    27,701

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    How long has the oil been in there? I used to run Castrol 5w30 in a 520 and it was find year round, but ran Castrol 10w40 once (all I had when the trans was apart) and it was HARD to shift in the winter until it warned up. ... Maybe Redline MTL would be better?

    JT
    SDAC Director
    SDAC-Chicago President
    JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
    87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
    87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph

    www.badassperformance.com
    Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
    Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!

    Support SDAC! Join Today!
    "I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
    Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.

  7. #27
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Some of the oil in there was probably the original factory fill, its been 'exchanged' a couple times but never a complete drain and refill to get everything out. I have 2 quarts of amsoil 5w30 MTL but I dont know how well it would mix with the c0cktail of stuff in there now ?

  8. #28
    See me ride out of the sunset... Turbo Mopar Staff BadAssPerformance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicagoland!
    Posts
    27,701

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Hmmm.... yeah need to flush it out. no drain plug mod yet I take it? Pulling an daxle and tilting the car on its side very carefully can get some more out?

    JT
    SDAC Director
    SDAC-Chicago President
    JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
    87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
    87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph

    www.badassperformance.com
    Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
    Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!

    Support SDAC! Join Today!
    "I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
    Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.

  9. #29
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    No drain plug yet. The diff would have to come out and thats a whole can of worms I'm not ready for yet.
    I think for now I'll just fill it up and let it be, keep shifting like grandpa to keep everyone inside happy. I'm wondering though if the clutch isnt fully releasing sometimes and thats the notchy-ness because the input shaft, pinion shaft, gears/snychros arnt fully freewheeling while shifting ?

    I did put a 'newer' piece of brass on 5th, original looked fine but maybe it was worn enough to not grab the cone and slow things down fast enough.

  10. #30
    See me ride out of the sunset... Turbo Mopar Staff BadAssPerformance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicagoland!
    Posts
    27,701

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    or theres some 200k+ mile gunk built up in the synchro sets?

    JT
    SDAC Director
    SDAC-Chicago President
    JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
    87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
    87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph

    www.badassperformance.com
    Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
    Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!

    Support SDAC! Join Today!
    "I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
    Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.

  11. #31
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    There was a very light grey residue coating on everything, especially in the oil sump but hardly anything to get excited over.

  12. #32
    Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff Force Fed Mopar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Greenville/Spartanburg SC area
    Posts
    7,559

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    I'm running 5w20 oil in mine right now, shifts the same as it did w/ ATF+4. My shifter is worn a bit though, the white plastic pivot ball in the shifter has play in it. Causes some missed shifts when speed shifting, probably some notchiness too.

    BTW I was able to install a drain plug in my trans in the car, w/o removing anything. Was just real slow and careful about it. The little bit of shavings that might go through when the bit breaks through will flow out with the oil draining out. Been driving on it for a year now w/o any issues from it. Just make sure you use a thread sealer on it, even with a pipe plug.
    Rob M.
    '89 Turbo GTC

    2.5 TIII stroker, 568 w/ OBX and 3.77 FD

  13. #33
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    filled it up w/fresh 5w30 and played with the shifter adjustment. Crossed my fingers while pulling out of the driveway and went for a short test drive... All is good so far and maybe improved. Found the source of some annoying persistent noise and it turned out to be the shifter bushing for the selector cable, quick spray of lube shut it up.

  14. #34
    See me ride out of the sunset... Turbo Mopar Staff BadAssPerformance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicagoland!
    Posts
    27,701

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Cool, glad its better, ready for another 200k miles

    JT
    SDAC Director
    SDAC-Chicago President
    JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
    87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
    87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph

    www.badassperformance.com
    Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
    Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!

    Support SDAC! Join Today!
    "I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
    Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.

  15. #35
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Little update on this. Nothing worse but nothing really improved enough to say its 'fixed' to my liking or maybe I've just become over sensative from driving other newer 5 speed cars that have much more greatly refined transmissions ? and what feels like I'm forcing it into gear is actually 'normal' for a 523 especially when its got a ton of miles on it like this one does.? Either way after the little tear down and inspection last week I have a much higher and renewed level of confidence that this transmission can live to atleast 300k and not be in danger of self destructing and leaving me stranded somewhere. Some time probably this coming spring I will drop it out to replace atleast the input shaft bearings (now that I have the tools to service them) and the differential bearings (still source the tools) since they are most definetly worn and the source of the noise when coasting in gear.

  16. #36
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Piedmont, Ohio
    Posts
    4,109

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Did you sharpen the dog teeth at all? That will cause it to be hard to get into gear.

    Why did this topic get locked?
    Last edited by shackwrrr; 01-03-2011 at 01:49 PM. Reason: Dyslexia
    Ian Adams Function>Form 1990 shadow scrapped, too rusty:( 1991 Spirit R/T Scrapped, parts sold:( 1989 Turbo Caravan Daily beater with built-[I]ish [/I]​engine slowly evolving into weekend turbo beater.

  17. #37
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Didnt touch anything, the teeth on the 523 parts were all still in very good shape. Locked part was an oops.

  18. #38
    See me ride out of the sunset... Turbo Mopar Staff BadAssPerformance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicagoland!
    Posts
    27,701

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Maybe with that many miles it could be sloppy shift forks or rails or rail bushings too? Ya know, like something is binding?

    By "sloppy" I mean like the fork slops around on the rod so engagement to the slider is not as perpendicular as it could be... or maybe something bent?

    JT
    SDAC Director
    SDAC-Chicago President
    JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
    87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
    87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph

    www.badassperformance.com
    Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
    Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!

    Support SDAC! Join Today!
    "I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
    Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.

  19. #39
    Rhymes with tortoise. Turbo Mopar Staff cordes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Tuscola, IL
    Posts
    21,465

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Quote Originally Posted by BadAssPerformance View Post
    Maybe with that many miles it could be sloppy shift forks or rails or rail bushings too? Ya know, like something is binding?

    By "sloppy" I mean like the fork slops around on the rod so engagement to the slider is not as perpendicular as it could be... or maybe something bent?
    I could easily see that as being the case. I would check the fitment of the forks to the rails for sure.

  20. #40
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    All of the forks seemed to still have a tight fit on the rails, none of the roll pin holes were hogged out or sloppy from what I could see/feel with the end cover off. I thought about those little bushings... Are they tinned bronze or just a highly polished steel insert ?

    my normal shift sequence is 1-2 @ 15 mph, 2-3 @ 20-25, 3-4 @ 30 mph and 5th @ 40 mph. very little rpm change between gears

    ---------- Post added at 01:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:40 PM ----------

    Add on: If something was bent wouldnt the fork pads show signs of distress ? You saw the pictures, those 5th fork pads hardly have a wear groove on them.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Official 87 CSX 581 Thread
    By mcglsr2 in forum Shelby Models - Whittier Factory Cars
    Replies: 110
    Last Post: 03-21-2015, 08:18 AM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-10-2008, 12:16 AM
  3. Good original paint under a Bad Old Paint job.
    By rosie in forum Interior & Exterior Restoration
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-25-2008, 10:49 PM
  4. Good mods vs. not so good mods
    By GLHS592 in forum The Original "Turbo Dodge" Cars
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: 06-18-2006, 08:18 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •