Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 43

Thread: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 098.jpg 
Views:	3097 
Size:	351.1 KB 
ID:	27286

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 099.jpg 
Views:	410 
Size:	266.6 KB 
ID:	272875th doesnt take as much abuse like 1-4 but could this be a sign of good things ? Not sure whats considered 'worn' vs the standard new spec.

  2. #2
    See me ride out of the sunset... Turbo Mopar Staff BadAssPerformance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicagoland!
    Posts
    27,701

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Was it having 5th gear issues? I would say looks OK, but hard to know for sure with them still installed.

    JT
    SDAC Director
    SDAC-Chicago President
    JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
    87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
    87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph

    www.badassperformance.com
    Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
    Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!

    Support SDAC! Join Today!
    "I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
    Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.

  3. #3
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Was told it was running well without issues. I'm just doing a clean up, new seals, resealing the anerobic portions and checking the specs w/dial indicator before dropping it in the car.

  4. #4
    Supporting Member Turbo Mopar Contributor turbo84voyager's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Nanticoke PA
    Posts
    805

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Looks good from what I can see, I would run it. I have never seen an actuial spec for these, I am sure there is. Is there slop in the fork? If not leave it alone. 1-2 usuially takes the most beating atleast from my experience.
    Justin
    84 Plymouth Voyager LE 2.5 Intercooled Turbo 5-spd - Only 84 Turbo Van!
    89 Dodge Caravan ES 2.4 SRT-4 Intercooled Turbo (46 trim, OS Valves, CP Pistons, Eagle Rods, NPR IC) Built 31th trans
    91 Dodge Shadow Convertible 2.5 Intercooled Turbo A555 5-spd
    01 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP - 3.8 supercharged! Only 5K miles....
    01 Subaru Forester - Daily Driver
    07 Yamaha FJR 1300 140+ HP on 2 wheels
    85 Honda Nighthawk 450
    94 Bobcat 763 Skidloader 2.2 Kubota Diesel
    SV-SDAC Member

  5. #5
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    So some awesome grey sparkled 'stuff' was flowing out as I opened it up. which led me to further digging deeper... And what did I find???!!!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 100.jpg 
Views:	265 
Size:	363.3 KB 
ID:	27288

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 103.jpg 
Views:	286 
Size:	395.5 KB 
ID:	27289

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 102.jpg 
Views:	291 
Size:	505.0 KB 
ID:	27290

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 109.jpg 
Views:	254 
Size:	320.5 KB 
ID:	27291

    Found the aluminum source and something even better Even without the 'ears' arnt those pinion shafts supposed to be secured with a roll pin ? She was walkin' and its not midnight yet...

    looks like two new diff bearings and figure out what to do with this mess at the minimum.

  6. #6
    Buy my stuff!!!!!!!!!!! :O) Turbo Mopar Vendor turbovanmanČ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Abbotsford, BC
    Posts
    44,167

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    The shift pad looks a bit iffy but from the pic you've posted, the pointy synchro bits look good,

    You were supposed to remove the roll pin when using those ears, but I still like to use the roll pin, stops the shaft from wearing out the diff housing.
    1989 FWD Turbo Caravan-2.5 TIII, GT35R, auto, a/c, cruise, pwr windows/locks, fully loaded with interior and ran with full exhaust. RETIRED FOR A FEW YEARS! 12.57@104 :O)
    1984 Chev Getaway van, 6.2 Diesel with a remote mounted turbo setup burning WMO-For sale.
    2003 GSW 2.0L TDI, auto, fully loaded, modified, 360K-wife's.
    2004 GSW TDI, 5 speed, fully loaded, modified.

    Aurora ignition wires for sale. Link to info

    Super60 roller cams or custom/billet cams. Link to info

  7. #7
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Those 'ear' things were a joke, neither one fit tightly against the housing, both were cracked and the one was cutting the transmission case from where the pin was pushing on it and bending it out, dont think they were the mopar made pieces.

  8. #8
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    And the unplanned for but I'm glad I did now tear-down with pictures since we all like those.


    3-4 fork & pads
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 111.jpg 
Views:	332 
Size:	288.9 KB 
ID:	27348

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 112.jpg 
Views:	243 
Size:	352.3 KB 
ID:	27349


    3-4 cluster assembly
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 113.jpg 
Views:	400 
Size:	461.4 KB 
ID:	27350

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 120.jpg 
Views:	253 
Size:	514.6 KB 
ID:	27351


    1st
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 114.jpg 
Views:	228 
Size:	365.4 KB 
ID:	27352

    2nd
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 115.jpg 
Views:	232 
Size:	424.5 KB 
ID:	27353

    smooth with the finger nail test.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 116.jpg 
Views:	190 
Size:	254.1 KB 
ID:	27354

    Seems very undersized for the load it takes ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 117.jpg 
Views:	225 
Size:	393.3 KB 
ID:	27355


    1-2 fork & pads. little metal embedded and some side gouges. I may swap these for a set from another transmission or maybe just swap with 5th ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 118.jpg 
Views:	292 
Size:	357.9 KB 
ID:	27356

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 119.jpg 
Views:	230 
Size:	253.1 KB 
ID:	27357




    I'll be replacing both input shaft bearings and find some 3-4 fork pads (there not NS1 yet I hope ?) at the minimum. And probably buying the 'bearing and synchro' kit and seeing what it comes with. Oil slinger behind the I-shaft front bearing is snug in the case still so thats I good thing I guess..

  9. #9
    Hybrid booster
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    eagleville pa
    Posts
    845

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    if you need the natural colored pads i have new ones. i also have black ones too just no grey ones.

  10. #10
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Quote Originally Posted by onerippinturbo2 View Post
    if you need the natural colored pads i have new ones. i also have black ones too just no grey ones.
    for a 523/568 ?

  11. #11
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    7,065

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Even if OEM is ns1, can you get some from an aftermarket trans parts supplier?
    Brent GREAT DEPRESSION RACING 1992 Duster 3.0T The Junkyard - MS II, OEM 10:1 -[I] Old - 11.5@125 22psi $90 [U]Stock[/U] 3.0 Junk Motor - 1 bar MAP [/I] 1994 Spirit 3.0T - 11.5@120 20 psi - Daily :eyebrows: Holset He351 -FT600 - 393whp 457ft/lb @18psi 1994 Spirit 3.0T a670 - He341, stock fuel, BEGI. Wife's into kid's project. 1990 Lebaron Coupe 2.2 TI/II non IC, a413 1990 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1993 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1994 Duster 3.0 A543 1981 Starlet KP61 Potential driver -- 1981 Starlet KP61 Parts -- 1983 Starlet KP61 Drag 2005 Durango Hemi Limited -- 1998 Dodge 12v 47re. AFC mods, No plate, Mack plug, Boost elbow -- 2011 Dodge 6.7 G56

  12. #12
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Quote Originally Posted by Ondonti View Post
    Even if OEM is ns1, can you get some from an aftermarket trans parts supplier?
    All of the aftermarket "kits" contain nothing more than what can still be had from chrysler/aftermarket because they are either buying it from chrysler or the companies who made it for chrysler originally.

  13. #13
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Some more questions. According to the 90 and 91 parts catalogs the 1-2 and 5th gear synchro assemblys are different between the two years. All other components related to them like the fork and pads are the same right down to the p/n listed and having both a 90 and 91 sets of parts here that checks out ok. But when doing a side by side comparison of the 1-2 & 5th clusters the synchro portion looks identical in every possible way even switching parts around everything goes together and functions like normal. I dont remember the build date for the 91 set of parts but it is a large spline input so its certainly a '91' model year transmission as far as production goes.

  14. #14
    See me ride out of the sunset... Turbo Mopar Staff BadAssPerformance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicagoland!
    Posts
    27,701

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    I used some 90 parts to fix my 91 the last time I had it out. I used 2nd, 3rd and 4th gears and a 2nd gear stop ring. I did not notice any differences between any of those parts but did see some slight differences in the pad material on the stop rings in the spare parts box. I did not notice any differences in the syncro rings but didnt use and so didnt look as hard at them. I did however notice that the 91 3/4 fork was a tiny little bit beefier.

    JT
    SDAC Director
    SDAC-Chicago President
    JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
    87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
    87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph

    www.badassperformance.com
    Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
    Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!

    Support SDAC! Join Today!
    "I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
    Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.

  15. #15
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Good to hear.

  16. #16
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    1st gear blocker ring. Is there a published wear spec for these ?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 130.jpg 
Views:	166 
Size:	221.9 KB 
ID:	27673Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 131.jpg 
Views:	146 
Size:	293.3 KB 
ID:	27672

  17. #17
    See me ride out of the sunset... Turbo Mopar Staff BadAssPerformance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicagoland!
    Posts
    27,701

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    No idea what the spec ism, but it looks OK to me but 1st usually does unless you downshift hard a bunch. How does 2nd gear look?

    JT
    SDAC Director
    SDAC-Chicago President
    JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
    87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
    87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph

    www.badassperformance.com
    Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
    Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!

    Support SDAC! Join Today!
    "I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
    Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.

  18. #18
    Super Moderator Turbo Mopar Staff 135sohc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    6,179

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    Same condition overall.

    Last night to waste time I took the rest of the assembly apart to closely inspect each gear. 1-3rd and to a lesser extent 4th were just plain nasty IMO though. Excessive 'normal' wear and a few broken teeth on both 2 and 3.

    Has anyone ever thought about getting the teeth welded up and reshaped to replace whats worn off ?

  19. #19
    See me ride out of the sunset... Turbo Mopar Staff BadAssPerformance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicagoland!
    Posts
    27,701

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    I wish there was a way! Its hard to do that to heat treated steel.

    JT
    SDAC Director
    SDAC-Chicago President
    JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
    87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
    87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph

    www.badassperformance.com
    Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
    Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!

    Support SDAC! Join Today!
    "I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
    Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.

  20. #20
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Piedmont, Ohio
    Posts
    4,109

    Re: Good or bad: synchro, pad fork picture

    you can reshape them with a small file, Just make them pointy again and they will be good. No need to add material.
    Ian Adams Function>Form 1990 shadow scrapped, too rusty:( 1991 Spirit R/T Scrapped, parts sold:( 1989 Turbo Caravan Daily beater with built-[I]ish [/I]​engine slowly evolving into weekend turbo beater.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Official 87 CSX 581 Thread
    By mcglsr2 in forum Shelby Models - Whittier Factory Cars
    Replies: 110
    Last Post: 03-21-2015, 08:18 AM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-10-2008, 12:16 AM
  3. Good original paint under a Bad Old Paint job.
    By rosie in forum Interior & Exterior Restoration
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-25-2008, 10:49 PM
  4. Good mods vs. not so good mods
    By GLHS592 in forum The Original "Turbo Dodge" Cars
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: 06-18-2006, 08:18 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •