Say Hello To My Little Friend.....

[Directconnection]

Precision SC6262SP

Billet compressor, and .63ar turbine housing w/internal gate provision. Journal bearing.... and that's fine by me.

I originally seeked out Larry Jolliffe's old SC6152S, but was turned on by a few people who recommended this "upgrade" over the older SC61. Ondonti was one, as were a few others on this board (you know who you are)

With the .82ar on the smaller displacement 1.8 Hondas, they were reaching full boost at a lofty 5,000 rpms, yet they really start moving air in the upper rpms due to their inherit short stroke design (and good flowing heads) 650-700whp is what I found they were making (yeah, I spent some time on the Honda forums)

Talking with good 'ole Larry on the phone a few weeks ago, his SC61 was making boost at 3,500 rpms with the .63ar (either 10psi or it was 15... can't remember) and full boost was seen at 4,400 rpms. 3,700 rpms and power came on in a big "whoosh" as Larry put it. The SC6262 should spool this combo a slight bit sooner... I have only heard one marginal feedback response, and it was with a high powered 8v that didn't notice too much difference with the SC61 to SC62.

And no... not going to try and make a 650whp terror. Baby steps 1st..... but I do wish to turn up the wick sometime down the road once the car is all sorted out.

Enough bench racing from the "Bench Racing Master tm" that has no current TM's running ..... time to enjoy the pix!

[bakes]

Now that's what im talking about!!!!

[Directconnection]

Guess I better change my sig, huh? I just noticed it said "50 trim" on my IROC R/T project in the works.

50 trim is still a very good turbo.... just ask Pat.

[Pat]

50 trim is still a very good turbo.... just ask Pat.

It is...but I'd still trade my 50 trim for a 6262 anyday!

Nice choice. I was seriously considering that very turbo about a year ago, but it wasn't in the cards just yet.

Keep us posted on how it works out!

[Directconnection]

It is...but I'd still trade my 50 trim for a 6262 anyday!

Nice choice. I was seriously considering that very turbo about a year ago, but it wasn't in the cards just yet.

Keep us posted on how it works out!

I won't know how well it works until springtime. The car has some kinks that need to be worked out, too

I was thinking about how well this would work on your GRM Shadow, but wondered how your times would suffer on the autocross with an on/off switch sort of boost response. Maybe the 50 trim is better suited for that style?

[turbovanman²]

Damn dude, no money but sheesh, you've gone big or go home, lol.

I am using also .82 housing, full boost at 4200 rpm.

Guess I better change my sig, huh? I just noticed it said "50 trim" on my IROC R/T project in the works.

50 trim is still a very good turbo.... just ask Pat.

Also ask Warren Stramer.

[1966 dart wagon]

That is a work of art. and a huge housing at .82

I've see those holes in the compressor side around the wheel on alot of high hp turbo'd cars, what are those for??

[turbovanman²]

That is a work of art. and a huge housing at .82

I've see those holes in the compressor side around the wheel on alot of high hp turbo'd cars, what are those for??

Its called a ported cover, it makes the compressor smaller so to speak, I guess think of it as a bleed. Holsets have it but done differently. My GT35R was surging at 30 psi, so I put a ported cover on, fixed. They say it makes it laggier but I and others found out it actually helps spool.

[cordes]

Very cool Steve. Keep us informed!

[Directconnection]

Thanks guys! I'll keep you posted, for sure. I am getting guidance on this project from many people.... including one from behind the Shadows... Larry

Simon, I went with the .63 ar since Larry had good success with it on his SC61. Your 2.5 would probably spool this even sooner with my .63.

[turbovanman²]

Thanks guys! I'll keep you posted, for sure. I am getting guidance on this project from many people.... including one from behind the Shadows... Larry

Simon, I went with the .63 ar since Larry had good success with it on his SC61. Your 2.5 would probably spool this even sooner with my .63.

Yeah, I mentioned that as you said Honda's spool it at 5000 rpm, so its a reference for you. Can't wait to see you have a running TM and with a nice turbo,

[Directconnection]

Can't wait to see you have a running TM and with a nice turbo,

Don't jinx me now

It will still be a while....

BTW: the $ for this and other rebuild parts all came from me selling most of my performance 8v goodies. Sad thing to see them go one by one... but I can hoard 100 cool things, or have a few select really nice items on a running vehicle again.

[contraption22]

You put that on the car yet?

How about now?

Now?

How's it drive?

[Directconnection]

You put that on the car yet?

How about now?

Now?

How's it drive?

I can put in on the hood for now....

[Ondonti]

The ported cover actually hurts efficiency because it recirculates air that has already been compressed. When you are dealing with surge, sometimes that is the only answer. I don't really think this turbo would surge on a manual trans car.


You are going to enjoy that turbo even when you are only running 10-15 pounds.

[turbovanman²]

Tell you what Steve, being the nice guy I am, let me try it out for you, its a shame to have that sit all winter and maybe spring and maybe even summer,

[thefitisgay]

man makes me wish i would have shot higher than a s60

[BIG PSI]

That turbo sure looks S-W-E-E-T !!!!!!!!

Will it bolt up to our exhaust manifolds; say a 1989 model ?

Chuck

[Directconnection]

Tell you what Steve, being the nice guy I am, let me try it out for you, its a shame to have that sit all winter and maybe spring and maybe even summer,

Knowing your grenading skillz.... maybe not

[Directconnection]

That turbo sure looks S-W-E-E-T !!!!!!!!

Will it bolt up to our exhaust manifolds; say a 1989 model ?

Chuck

No, it uses the other style bolt pattern vs. the Chrysler (Ford?)