Page 8 of 23 FirstFirst ... 45678910111218 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 160 of 442

Thread: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

  1. #141

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    I think YOU'RE a top nut. Actually, this is pretty good. I've always had the problem with the nut being hard to thread onto the shock. I may go this route with my factory/coil-over setup.

    Quote Originally Posted by rbryant View Post
    You are missing some information about the top nut.

    Attachment 31290
    Attachment 31291
    Attachment 31292

    The Mag nut takes the place of the spacer and is threaded all the way to the bottom. That way it can extend into the bushing and still have threads. This eliminates the problem of the threaded part of the shaft not being long enough. It took me a while to figure out what to do....

    -Rich
    [SIZE="3"] [B]Jon Trotter[/B][/SIZE] [B]1985[/B] Dodge Shelby Charger, Currently decommissioned [B]1987[/B] Shelby GLHS, #937 [B]1987[/B] Shelby Lancer, #628 [QUOTE=Reeves;587010]I can be ready. Please send pics of wife. _____DodgeZ add comments here______[/QUOTE]

  2. #142

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    Is 12x1.5 the same thread pitch on the Koni rear shocks? Anyone know that size? I think I'm going to order a pair of those.
    [SIZE="3"] [B]Jon Trotter[/B][/SIZE] [B]1985[/B] Dodge Shelby Charger, Currently decommissioned [B]1987[/B] Shelby GLHS, #937 [B]1987[/B] Shelby Lancer, #628 [QUOTE=Reeves;587010]I can be ready. Please send pics of wife. _____DodgeZ add comments here______[/QUOTE]

  3. #143
    Basic Vendor (MSD, Hawk, etc) Turbo Mopar Contributor rbryant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    3,493

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    Quote Originally Posted by minigts View Post
    Is 12x1.5 the same thread pitch on the Koni rear shocks? Anyone know that size? I think I'm going to order a pair of those.
    These were M12x1.25. I think the konis were the same but I can't remember. Just be careful when buying them because most of the MAG lugnuts are M12x1.5 and I had a harder time finding them in the finer M12x1.25 pitch.

    They just require the top washer to be drilled out to 11/16" and then they work.


    The BC adjuster is a 3mm allen hex so I just provide a t-handle wrench for that which you stick down inside of the nut in place of the normal adjustment dial that goes on them.

    The hex portion is extra tall on MAG lugnuts so it might stick up too far to allow access to the larger plastic koni adjuster. If that is the case you would have to chop off some of it so that you can get to the adjuster on the konis.

    I bought a dozen or so of them so we can probably work out a deal in PM for a pair of them.


    -Rich

  4. #144
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Piedmont, Ohio
    Posts
    4,109

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    any reason why you couldn't reinforce that area on the other bodies and run the same strut?
    Ian Adams Function>Form 1990 shadow scrapped, too rusty:( 1991 Spirit R/T Scrapped, parts sold:( 1989 Turbo Caravan Daily beater with built-[I]ish [/I]​engine slowly evolving into weekend turbo beater.

  5. #145
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Hazelwood, MO
    Posts
    6,566

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    Darn...I forgot about the MAG nut trick. Oh well, I don't have an L-body anyways! LOL

  6. #146
    Basic Vendor (MSD, Hawk, etc) Turbo Mopar Contributor rbryant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    3,493

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    Quote Originally Posted by shackwrrr View Post
    any reason why you couldn't reinforce that area on the other bodies and run the same strut?
    I thought about that a lot and it was my initial idea.

    The reason I went away from it is because the adjuster is inside of the shaft like a koni. If you drill a hole in the body of several of the cars the adjuster would be virtually inaccessible. For instance it would be under the speaker on a shadow.

    The QA1 adjuster is on the side of the shock body which makes it a better setup and makes it bolt on without any mods.

    You could however use the same shock but I would actually suggest using the MK3 Golf shock for a daytona. It is slightly too long for a charger/omni but would work well if you were to do the drill/reinforce method and the bottom mount/bushing is a closer match.

    -Rich

  7. #147
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Piedmont, Ohio
    Posts
    4,109

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    Quote Originally Posted by rbryant View Post
    I thought about that a lot and it was my initial idea.

    The reason I went away from it is because the adjuster is inside of the shaft like a koni. If you drill a hole in the body of several of the cars the adjuster would be virtually inaccessible. For instance it would be under the speaker on a shadow.

    The QA1 adjuster is on the side of the shock body which makes it a better setup and makes it bolt on without any mods.

    You could however use the same shock but I would actually suggest using the MK3 Golf shock for a daytona. It is slightly too long for a charger/omni but would work well if you were to do the drill/reinforce method and the bottom mount/bushing is a closer match.

    -Rich
    Cool thanks, the adjuster doesn't worry me, I would find a way to get in there (access hole) or just run 6x9's elsewhere. Im sure the lower mount would also require strengthening too. My next thought was to use a universal coilover and build upper mounts but these usually lack the convenience of an external adjuster.
    http://www.utvguide.net/images/UTVSh...Standard-1.jpg
    Ian Adams Function>Form 1990 shadow scrapped, too rusty:( 1991 Spirit R/T Scrapped, parts sold:( 1989 Turbo Caravan Daily beater with built-[I]ish [/I]​engine slowly evolving into weekend turbo beater.

  8. #148
    Basic Vendor (MSD, Hawk, etc) Turbo Mopar Contributor rbryant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    3,493

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    Quote Originally Posted by shackwrrr View Post
    Cool thanks, the adjuster doesn't worry me, I would find a way to get in there (access hole) or just run 6x9's elsewhere. Im sure the lower mount would also require strengthening too. My next thought was to use a universal coilover and build upper mounts but these usually lack the convenience of an external adjuster.
    http://www.utvguide.net/images/UTVSh...Standard-1.jpg
    There is no room for a coilover spring over the top of the shocks on the non lbody cars. The shock comes very close to the frame rail. It would require fabrication of new mounts and I am not sure what clearance issues you might run into.

    I am working on some spring height adjusters for the non lbody that go in the stock spring location and require only one 1/2" hole in the axle where the stock spring goes in order to work. It is just taking a while to get to it. Hopefully in the next few weeks I will have prototypes.

    -Rich

  9. #149
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Piedmont, Ohio
    Posts
    4,109

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    Quote Originally Posted by rbryant View Post
    There is no room for a coilover spring over the top of the shocks on the non lbody cars. The shock comes very close to the frame rail. It would require fabrication of new mounts and I am not sure what clearance issues you might run into.

    I am working on some spring height adjusters for the non lbody that go in the stock spring location and require only one 1/2" hole in the axle where the stock spring goes in order to work. It is just taking a while to get to it. Hopefully in the next few weeks I will have prototypes.

    -Rich
    Thats why I was thinking of building an alternate upper mount.
    Ian Adams Function>Form 1990 shadow scrapped, too rusty:( 1991 Spirit R/T Scrapped, parts sold:( 1989 Turbo Caravan Daily beater with built-[I]ish [/I]​engine slowly evolving into weekend turbo beater.

  10. #150
    Basic Vendor (MSD, Hawk, etc) Turbo Mopar Contributor rbryant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    3,493

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    Quote Originally Posted by shackwrrr View Post
    Thats why I was thinking of building an alternate upper mount.
    Everything I am working on must bolt on with the biggest change being a possible hole to mount an adjustable spring perch.

    If you are going to do extensive modifications you might as well consider adapting a neon IRS.... At a minimum the panhard bar should be converted into a watts linkage.

    I think that becomes a different thread though...

    -Rich

  11. #151
    turbo addict Turbo Mopar Contributor iTurbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Gillette, Wyoming
    Posts
    5,384

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    Hey guys just thought I would bump this thread as I'm going this route with my '87 Shelby CSX build. For the front I'm going with the BC kit for the Golf, with Rich's adapter plates. The rears haven't quite got all the details worked out yet, but I did get some QA1 TS801 rear shocks and BC rear springs on the way which will need a little adaptation to make work. I even got a set of end-link anti sway bars from polybushings.com on the way. Car is going to be a hoot! Stay tuned...

  12. #152
    Basic Vendor (MSD, Hawk, etc) Turbo Mopar Contributor rbryant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    3,493

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    Here are a couple of pictures of the recessed bolt plates on my GLHS.

    This updated design now has the bolt head recessed below the level of the plate so they can maximize the adjustments for non modified cars.

    The plates work the same way on the GJKHPA plates.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BC Lbody Recessed Plates 001.jpg 
Views:	9631 
Size:	89.3 KB 
ID:	32791

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BC Lbody Recessed Plates 002.jpg 
Views:	14753 
Size:	100.2 KB 
ID:	32792

    -Rich

  13. #153
    turbo addict Turbo Mopar Contributor
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    7,063

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    If the spring was located on the bottom of the shock can you get anymore room in the non L bodies? I know that I have had tires rub on normal rear shocks so obviously nothing can go there.
    Is the spring seat on the axle very strong if you are just drilling 1 hole in the middle? Seems like you would need to add a little plate there to spread the load.
    Brent GREAT DEPRESSION RACING 1992 Duster 3.0T The Junkyard - MS II, OEM 10:1 -[I] Old - 11.5@125 22psi $90 [U]Stock[/U] 3.0 Junk Motor - 1 bar MAP [/I] 1994 Spirit 3.0T - 11.5@120 20 psi - Daily :eyebrows: Holset He351 -FT600 - 393whp 457ft/lb @18psi 1994 Spirit 3.0T a670 - He341, stock fuel, BEGI. Wife's into kid's project. 1990 Lebaron Coupe 2.2 TI/II non IC, a413 1990 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1993 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1994 Duster 3.0 A543 1981 Starlet KP61 Potential driver -- 1981 Starlet KP61 Parts -- 1983 Starlet KP61 Drag 2005 Durango Hemi Limited -- 1998 Dodge 12v 47re. AFC mods, No plate, Mack plug, Boost elbow -- 2011 Dodge 6.7 G56

  14. #154
    Basic Vendor (MSD, Hawk, etc) Turbo Mopar Contributor rbryant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    3,493

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ondonti View Post
    If the spring was located on the bottom of the shock can you get anymore room in the non L bodies?
    The springs are always setup to be on the top even on the inverted style struts. If you moved them to the bottom perhaps it could add some clearance if you could get the springs to be 100% inside of the rim. That setup might bend the strut rod (it puts all force on the rod and not the spring hat) and it isn't available anyway.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ondonti
    I know that I have had tires rub on normal rear shocks so obviously nothing can go there.
    Agreed, there is no room for a coilover rear on the GJKHPA cars.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ondonti
    Is the spring seat on the axle very strong if you are just drilling 1 hole in the middle?
    Seems like you would need to add a little plate there to spread the load.
    I am not sure what you are talking about. The front spring hat setup is very similar to stock except it uses a spherical bearing.

    This is a front picture and the rear is completely different because it uses a shockeye mount on the bottom.

    -Rich

  15. #155
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Hazelwood, MO
    Posts
    6,566

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    Rich, were those pictures just to illustrate the set-up, or was that a completed install? The reason I ask is because the nylocks on those nuts aren't even engaging the threads from the bolts. I hope Loctite of some kind was used, or is suggested in that case. Another solution, of course, is a longer bolt and let the end customer trim to the desired end length.

  16. #156
    Basic Vendor (MSD, Hawk, etc) Turbo Mopar Contributor rbryant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    3,493

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    Quote Originally Posted by Reaper1 View Post
    Rich, were those pictures just to illustrate the set-up, or was that a completed install? The reason I ask is because the nylocks on those nuts aren't even engaging the threads from the bolts. I hope Loctite of some kind was used, or is suggested in that case. Another solution, of course, is a longer bolt and let the end customer trim to the desired end length.
    Just an illustration of the plates.

    The bolts are only finger tight and no weight is on the car. The nylon lock is tight enough to where you can't turn the bolt into them easily with your fingers.

    The bolts extend past the nylon lock when tight but I hadn't tightened them down yet in the picture. I was concentrating on the adjuster to plate connection and not looking at the outer bolts.

    -Rich

  17. #157
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Hazelwood, MO
    Posts
    6,566

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    Gotcha!

  18. #158
    Basic Vendor (MSD, Hawk, etc) Turbo Mopar Contributor rbryant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    3,493

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    I just added pictures of the newly developed bottom bushings for installing 1G eclipse shocks on an lbody to post 140:

    http://www.turbo-mopar.com/forums/sh...l=1#post815014

    This most of the important Lbody rear reference pictures in one post.

    It also completes the last detail on making the BC coilovers bolt on to an lbody with no modifications required!

    -Rich

  19. #159
    The moderately moderate moderator Turbo Mopar Staff
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Akron, Ohio
    Posts
    6,870

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    I like how it all fits. Rich is great to deal with(as many already know). I haven't driven mine yet with the new setup, but it sits lower and looks better.
    Thanks again Rich.
    Bryan
    86 GLHS #161, 2016 Impala
    SDAC National Member, SDAC Buckeye Chapter Member

    A man has got to know his limitations.....

  20. #160
    turbo addict Turbo Mopar Contributor
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    1,812

    Re: Official BC Coilover Kit Development Interest.

    Good Stuff!

Page 8 of 23 FirstFirst ... 45678910111218 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Mobil 1 reproduction plaques, interest?
    By LaserXT1986 in forum General Vendor Area
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 11-17-2012, 10:22 AM
  2. any interest in a a413 LSD?
    By boostedgolf in forum Transmission
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-12-2011, 01:32 PM
  3. CSX Style grills -Interest?
    By Darkapollo in forum Interior, Exterior and Chassis Modifications
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 09-12-2008, 11:23 PM
  4. Interest in IN group
    By fleckster in forum Shelby Dodge Auto Club
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-22-2006, 02:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •