I wasn't sure how much you guys had modified. And, I couldn't remember what all it was setup for. Lemme make a couple of changes to the MAP scaling and header for you. Gimme a couple of minutes...
I wasn't sure how much you guys had modified. And, I couldn't remember what all it was setup for. Lemme make a couple of changes to the MAP scaling and header for you. Gimme a couple of minutes...
OK, here's the table file with the MAP info and header updated for your cal...
yup^^^
sean you want me to come over a little earlier than 6pm to mess with Turbonator LM on the charger and your cal on the CSX?
brian
I got to sit down with the cal and Brian's explanation of what the different warm up curves were really helped. I wound up adding a bunch of fuel to the pumping efficiency at idle and also on curve B, but I subtracted a bunch of fuel from curve a and c. I got it idling pretty well.....right around 14.5 to 15.0. I think its actually a bit rich because if you rev it up and then let it settle....it immediately settles to about 12.0:1 until the computer gets the o2 feedback and adjusts to 14. Ive got some more playing around to do but its waaay better then it was before.
i was planning on being at laskys at 6pm.
brian
good deal. glad it is working for you now.
brian
Yes, i got impatient and didnt want to wait for you to help me set up robs updates, so I just tried this on a whim and it worked. I guess I could sense what the computer was doing, i just needed the explanation of what each of those curves controlled. That helped a lot.
Id still like to get the updates on this cal on saturday though, so ill bring the computer along with me.
OK.....now ive got it idling decent. Its slow to rev down after initial start up and if I rev it up in neutral.....takes an extra long time for the revs to drop down to idle. What can I mess with to get it decel faster?
Well, it depends. When the idle hangs high, is the A/F rich, lean or just right?
I think there's too many possibilities at this point. I could tell you how to adjust the idle speed, but I don't know if that's what's wrong.
there is a significant amount of timing in that cal iirc. i wonder if that is the issue combined with the fact that its a MP based cal and TempAboveWhichSparkScatterIsActive and ScatterInhibitBelowThisSpeed are set to keep the revs high between shifts according to the description in the table file.
Brian