That will be sick,
1989 FWD Turbo Caravan-2.5 TIII, GT35R, auto, a/c, cruise, pwr windows/locks, fully loaded with interior and ran with full exhaust. RETIRED FOR A FEW YEARS!12.57@104 :O)
1984 Chev Getaway van, 6.2 Diesel with a remote mounted turbo setup burning WMO-For sale.
2003 GSW 2.0L TDI, auto, fully loaded, modified, 360K-wife's.
2004 GSW TDI, 5 speed, fully loaded, modified.
Aurora ignition wires for sale. Link to info
Super60 roller cams or custom/billet cams. Link to info
I agree, he better plan doing some work on the --- end of the car too, those things dont hook with a hot n/a smallblock
I like the car/build but i find it funny that in the video the guy is talking about it being a 9 second car on 93, when the car was CLEARLY hooking up on the street from like 40mph. Hmmm... something tells me its not a 9 second car!
120mph traps are pretty nice, but something tells me that guy yelling 9 second car would be flabbergasted if something like Ondonti's 120mph rustbucket plymouth sundance was inching past him
Nice car though!
Dont push the red button.You hear me?
god that would be pricelessOriginally Posted by Vigo
I like the car/build but i find it funny that in the video the guy is talking about it being a 9 second car on 93, when the car was CLEARLY hooking up on the street from like 40mph. Hmmm... something tells me its not a 9 second car!
120mph traps are pretty nice, but something tells me that guy yelling 9 second car would be flabbergasted if something like Ondonti's 120mph rustbucket plymouth sundance was inching past him
Nice car though!
I really doubt that car is a 9 second car.god that would be priceless
like Vortecs 14.4 second 98' Honda Civic, it had 271 WHP. This car has a very steep power curve from too big of a turbo. If he put a smaller one on there that would spool fast and make the same power the car would be a lot faster. As for power and so on. Drag shocks, slant 6 bars and a slide a link rear suspension would get it to hook enough with slicks to run 9s. My 2.2 on 3 pistons made more WHP at 4,000 RPM than this engine though.... You can't do that if you want to be quick.
he ran a 12.08 @ 120 on the post with a 140 gph fuel pumpneeds more fuel
eh, but at 600 WHP on a A body? That is terrible.....he ran a 12.08 @ 120 on the post with a 140 gph fuel pump
In a heavy Challenger I ran 12.35 @ 121 with a 440 that had a short block wore .036 over and burning 3 quarts per pass. I was 19 and I had heads on it I ported in HS. I even built my own trans at 19. No where near 600 WHP and now where near the tire or the low weight. I even had a 284 / 484 hydraulic cam... The difference is that I had power EVERYWHERE, there is no peak in that combo. That thing has nearly 800 crank HP and ran a 12.0Impressive? Kidding? He needs a smaller turbo bad!
no I'm like not enough fuel for what he is running.eh, but at 600 WHP on a A body? That is terrible.....
In a heavy Challenger I ran 12.35 @ 121 with a 440 that had a short block wore .036 over and burning 3 quarts per pass. I was 19 and I had heads on it I ported in HS. I even built my own trans at 19. No where near 600 WHP and now where near the tire or the low weight. I even had a 284 / 484 hydraulic cam... The difference is that I had power EVERYWHERE, there is no peak in that combo. That thing has nearly 800 crank HP and ran a 12.0
Carb fuel pressure is a nice thing as a given pump can flow a lot more @7 psi vs 70 psi for us.
But i dont know what that pump was rated 140gph at.
Dont push the red button.You hear me?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
