I was wondering why the fuel full throttle has so few data pints to adjust and the part throttle has so many. it makes sense that you could tune it more precisely with more points, or am i just wrong? I was wondering if this was the case how can we add more points?
To me, the WOT is less finicky, so maybe that's why the less points. If you go to the KC, then calibration section, Brian tells you how to do it.
1989 FWD Turbo Caravan-2.5 TIII, GT35R, auto, a/c, cruise, pwr windows/locks, fully loaded with interior and ran with full exhaust. RETIRED FOR A FEW YEARS!12.57@104 :O)
1984 Chev Getaway van, 6.2 Diesel with a remote mounted turbo setup burning WMO-For sale.
2003 GSW 2.0L TDI, auto, fully loaded, modified, 360K-wife's.
2004 GSW TDI, 5 speed, fully loaded, modified.
Aurora ignition wires for sale. Link to info
Super60 roller cams or custom/billet cams. Link to info
Think of each point as a change in the target A/F. Why do you need it to change so much at WOT? If you want to really tune for WOT, you should be using the PumpEff table, not the A/F table.
OK that makes sense to use the pump eff. can you explain more how the WOT works?
The 3 fuel PW tables are assuming 100% vol eff. Which means that they are really just target A/F tables (assuming a specific injector flow rate, etc.). The other tables compensate for various attributes like charge temp, VolEff, coolant temp, etc.
For part throttle and idle, though, the O2 feedback influences the A/F as well. For WOT, no feedback is used.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote