Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Control arm comparison

  1. #1
    Garrett booster
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Balt. ,Maryland
    Posts
    205

    Control arm comparison

    I have a 90 k-frame with control arms. Also have control arms from a dynasty. They need an odd combo of bushings, from what I understand. So, would it be worth it to get control arms of a 91+ k-frame? Need to get the best suspesion setup possible. Thanks.


    JD

  2. #2
    turbo addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Coos Bay, Oregon
    Posts
    5,439

    Re: Control arm comparison

    For now the, the polyurethane bushings into a 1990 a-arm is a very good set up. The cast arms are real nice (1991+) but you would have to use rubber bushings, as the ones you can buy for them from moog and spicer are made from Remco and do not usually fit correctly.

    Johnny

  3. #3
    Supporting Member Turbo Mopar Contributor supercrackerbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Firth, Nebraska
    Posts
    5,022

    Re: Control arm comparison

    Yeah, kinda makes me wish I'd hung on to the '90 bushings and just bought some stamped arms. Have you given any more consideration to making bushings for the cast arms? What is actually different between the two as far as the bushings are concerned?

Similar Threads

  1. Boost control opinions...
    By ShelGame in forum EFI Tuning
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-12-2008, 12:05 AM
  2. 93 IROC R/T engine harness
    By jonnyb in forum 16v Factory Engines
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-09-2008, 02:06 PM
  3. T2 stock boost control components
    By Aries_Turbo in forum Turbos & Intercoolers!
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-30-2007, 10:26 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •