Maybe it's time to reevaluate what I'm asking for my car.
Maybe it's time to reevaluate what I'm asking for my car.
Kevin Isenberg EVERYTHING is for sale!
http://www.turbo-mopar.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=47704
Updated figures as of March 2010
I dont know if this has been said yet but a CSX VNT went for $23,100 on Barrett Jackson in the last month!
Featured multiple times here.
That was an 88 CSX-T
JT
SDAC Director
SDAC-Chicago President
JOIN SDAC and your local Chapter TODAY! - SUPPORT the CLUB that supports YOUR HOBBY!
87 Shelby Z - 10.50@141.66mph
87 CSX #751 Clone - 12.88@102.88mph
www.badassperformance.com
Check out Turbo-Mopar Times!
Submit your 1/4 mile times HERE!!
Support SDAC! Join Today!
"I'm not some pro athlete with a bajillion dollars, I'm just an every man"
Note: The information and any images provided in this post are not for distribution outside this forum without the author's permission.
So for anyone who hasn't looked at the NADA site in as long of a time as I have, check out the influx in prices that these cars have gone up! Mainly, the 1987 S cars, yikes! :yikes:
Made a chart up on our website for easier reading:
https://sites.google.com/site/theste...referenceguide
Kev
That means its telling you that you must keep it!!! No really, I can't believe it hasn't sold either as your car is beautiful!
The NADA guides are more for insurance reference in my eyes as they definitely don't reflect real world market prices.
As always, those values are whacked. 87 GLHS worth more then the 86? Shelby Lancer worth twice what a CSX-T is worth? Dakota values the same as 86 GLHS? Lol, good luck with that...
It must be that 26xx mile 87 glhs that keeps getting flipped for around 15k that is skewing those numbers.
"......Dakota values the same as 86 GLHS? .........."
that right there illustrates the gross errors in these listings. the Shelby trucks are the least valuable of the group no doubt about that and the 86S is the most valuable. yet they are listed as same price.....what a lame price guide.
My gut feeling is that most Dakota and 87 GLHS owners are not going to feel that it is a lame price guide. I can understand 86 GLHS owners feeling the way you do. The best part is that the guide isn't the Bible. I know I have always read in the past(including the 80's)that the Charger was going to be worth more than the Omni in the long run. Personally, I wasn't wasn't always convinced of this.
Anyone who lists a Shelby z for twice as much as Iroc R/T = fail.
Brent GREAT DEPRESSION RACING 1992 Duster 3.0T The Junkyard - MS II, OEM 10:1 -[I] Old - 11.5@125 22psi $90 [U]Stock[/U] 3.0 Junk Motor - 1 bar MAP [/I] 1994 Spirit 3.0T - 11.5@120 20 psi - Daily :eyebrows: Holset He351 -FT600 - 393whp 457ft/lb @18psi 1994 Spirit 3.0T a670 - He341, stock fuel, BEGI. Wife's into kid's project. 1990 Lebaron Coupe 2.2 TI/II non IC, a413 1990 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1993 Spirit 3.0 E.S. 41TE -- 1994 Duster 3.0 A543 1981 Starlet KP61 Potential driver -- 1981 Starlet KP61 Parts -- 1983 Starlet KP61 Drag 2005 Durango Hemi Limited -- 1998 Dodge 12v 47re. AFC mods, No plate, Mack plug, Boost elbow -- 2011 Dodge 6.7 G56
Here is a spreadsheet for the latest values as of February 2012.
https://sites.google.com/site/theste...referenceguide
http://www.shelbyregistry.com/nada.phtml
I keep them up to date there.
Cheers.
I'd take the ShelbyZ over the R/T all day long. Better looking, better headlights. Better motor. Better/more comfortable seats. Just because one had 225hp stock and the other only 175 means nothing. The brakes and kframe are the only things better and those are easily retrofitted.