Search:

Type: Posts; User: Vigo; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Search: Search took 0.02 seconds.

  1. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Well if the engine wasnt spinning it shouldnt be interference from the alternator. At least you already know what system to be looking at.

    I love having a garage for the first time in my life....
  2. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Well, at least you got proof of something workable to go along with your aggravation of the system not doing what it says it will do.
  3. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Yeah, sounds like a pretty boring video. On the bright side, you did get all the way through a burnout without breaking any axles so in that respect the duster's track performance may be improving. :D
  4. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Sounds like you are figuring things out very quickly. It's good that you have time to dedicate to this because a standalone can be one step forward and two steps back if the only thing that really...
  5. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Yeah, the main advantage of tuning an n/a timing curve would be if the motor was stock enough so that Rob/etc could use those numbers for other people's stockish builds.

    We already know what...
  6. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Just borrow that spare 3.0 motor i saw in the back of Reaper's pickup truck. Or is something wrong with those too?
  7. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Long clutch-in will just make it worse. Shifting into 3rd from high rpms would mask the problem a little because the shaft speed will fall through the speed that 3rd wants at some point, regardless...
  8. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Yeah, that last line was my first thought as well when i found out, but i figured no point in rubbing it in. :(

    Hopefully you can get another chance sometime soon.
  9. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Sounds good, cant wait to hear.
  10. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Egggggcellent.
  11. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    This is in the duster..
  12. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Ed makes log headers out of weld-els. Certainly way better than a stock 3.0 front mani, but not equal-length headers by any means.
  13. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Looks like they would bolt on with little or no mods (easier to slot/grind/drill mounting holes in steel than cast iron) but the port shape doesnt look exactly right. If the height of those ports is...
  14. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Oooooh a strong NX2000. I like those things.
  15. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Looking good.. except i dont think that was 140. Unless your tach was off.
  16. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Glad to hear its running again.

    Hey if you wanna swap your awd caravan rear drivetrain for two 3.0 motors im down, meet me halfway tho :p
  17. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    I had a pretty rude awakening when i raced the Aries at GRM. Oddly enough, the first time i drag raced that car was AT the GRM event. I could only manage a 14.5, when the car felt like a low 13...
  18. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Brent, i witnessed the drag radial issue in another short wheelbase fwd, an overpowered festiva. The way they would let go one side at a time made the thing practically a deathtrap.

    Good to see...
  19. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Dont pay for a 3.0/604 core.. i got one here waiting for you to get around to it. :)
  20. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    i would say micrometers or even calipers would do the job, which you could borrow or already own, for checking out of round easily in the car.

    Did some 3.0 scoutwork of my own today, found out...
  21. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    graduate college and get a job? Brent prioritizes several things ahead of his car, and it doesn't owe him anything. He can break it, patch it, break it again, and hop in his spirit and go do...
  22. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Well, a lot of people who are underemployed or cant find jobs have more time than money... whether they like it or not. ;)

    A lot of people assume that just because your car has trapped ~120mph you...
  23. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    for general FYI to people interested in this:

    http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/Displayitem.taf?itemnumber=66863

    probly any old mic and solder wires onto the stock board. maybe even...
  24. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Holy Fack.

    Your new mission in life is to NEED those injectors. Then you will automatically be 'k-car god' and people on honda forums will be quoting YOU. lol.
  25. Replies
    314
    Views
    132,622

    Re: 10 second 190,000 mile low boost 3.0 build

    Well, thats a HUGE bummer. i mean if you consider how much those bearings were as a percentage of a $90 motor i think you probly lost about $7 to $8 by trashing them, not to mention anothe $15 or so...
Results 1 to 25 of 42
Page 1 of 2 1 2