Search:

Type: Posts; User: Force Fed Mopar; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Baller....lol nice though, what did you get?
  2. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Probably need to adjust the TPS Pump Shot and the Pumping Efficiency tables. Maybe the Map Pump Shot a little as well.
  3. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    My brother has one of those turd boost controllers too. We were just messing with it on his Eclipse the other day and I was like WTF is up with this thing. He was like "Ebay" lol.
  4. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Yeah narrowband needs to be close to the merge point as possible, wideband should be downstream 18-24" IIRC?
  5. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Why wouldn't it be? O2 doesn't care if you are stock or not.
  6. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Nice!
  7. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Looks like a PITA to work around :) Nice work though, should work good. I wouldn't increase the pipe size after the downpipe, would hurt the velocity it seems like to me.
  8. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    That's what I thought, but you guys were confusing me lol. Like I said before, good gains, the power curve is much flatter.
  9. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    So this dyno was done on a stock intake?
  10. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    I was thinking more about the top end combo as a whole, stock head/cam/intake vs ported head/F4 cam/modded intake.
  11. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Interesting that it spooled up pretty much the same on both setups.
  12. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Yeah it flattened out your power curve a bit. Not having as big of a torque spike at 3500 probably helps your traction, and it's making 40ish more tq at 5k. Hp steadily increases too instead of...
  13. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Where's the dyno sheet? Impatient minds are impatient :D
  14. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Not bad, can't wait to see the numbers. What boost were you running?
  15. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    That's what my 2.2 pulls with a FM 475 cam.
  16. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    The 2.5 in the Lebaron I bought from Bozo runs 20" w/ an F3 cam. FWIW :D
  17. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Vids or ban!
  18. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Very good numbers.
  19. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Shouldn't make any difference. I think the vacuum block thing is just easier to do in the car, as you don't have to drill any new holes, just buy the right fitting for the block inlet.
  20. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Looks slick.
  21. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    I do the same thing lol. I'm like "Whaaat, when'd I post that? Oh yeah, not me" :lol:
  22. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Pretty good runs.
  23. Replies
    466
    Views
    147,611

    Re: ForcedFedMopar's 85 GLH-T

    Lol, at first I was like "I don't have a GLH-T" :) Nice project man, good work.
Results 1 to 23 of 23