The carb cars had them. My 87 Charger which was NA had one on it before I removed it. I'll see if I can find a generic picture.
- - - Updated - - -
You can see where it is located in this...
Type: Posts; User: cordes; Keyword(s):
The carb cars had them. My 87 Charger which was NA had one on it before I removed it. I'll see if I can find a generic picture.
- - - Updated - - -
You can see where it is located in this...
I know there is a member of the board here who would be able to tune that for you. IIRC you can fly him out.
Sounds like a good plan. I've got a good stash, but those are for rainy days. Literally.
The distributor adapter is what I was referring to. Again, I'm coming at this thread from the angle of a guy wants a 2.5 in an LM car. Perhaps he'll state his goals by page 4 so we can make a more...
I think that's a perfect analogy Mike. But I don't think we'll be lucky enough for this to be like the original tube header argument thread. I may have joy snap a shot of me swinging an SBEC around...
There's not a real difference other than the fact that the 2.4 is much more difficult to get going with the stock stuff.
I don't dispute that aftermarket stuff from the 21st century is easily...
Those are great examples of well done megasquirt cars. Yours will be a great example very shortly too. All involved are using 2.4s which have a ton of support for MS. IMO there's not enough in the...
I think this is the reason why most think stock electronics are the way to go.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBwRsWZ_iSU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot3Z96JkM-4
Why not stock electronics? I'm very happy with my initial 2.5 TII atx turbonator LM cal.
ETA: For 4K you could fly someone out an have a darn good cal in no time IMO.