Search:

thanks for the input,

question was really would I have issues with big turbo , stock motor simply driving it to the paint or alignment shop as I build the car

I don't need a proper functioning...

I had a polished S60 with a .63 all it's own bolted in here that looked so sweet ... but the compressor looked so small ...

changed my mind and sold it long ago

I don't have an issue with the .82ar turbine housing as a later upgrade but I don't need to upgrade something that doesn't run ..yet
buying the turbo now without a turbine housing saves hundreds...

maybe I can attach multiple pics ..?
(first try)

not "summer driver" but purpose built road track car

from past experience my inner carnal lunatic and a turbo L body belongs on the track not the street ..trust me ...and the more I think of this...

with an alleged 19hp loss to drive the trans I'd say aim for at "wheels" and be happy if "at crank"

and as I said with an operating range of 4K to 7K but with the limiter set around 8K..I'll add ...

edit - this turned into a composition
... you might wanna come back with a fresh coffee ...

thanks for the input guys .. sorry for the long time getting back to this - "life happens"

todd -...

maybe I should ask the additional question of

GT3082 , or, GT3582..? (isma valve 655 head 314cam , s 60 cam and hopefully an R5 before they run out
-I only need the R5 to compare all three)...

this particular effort isn't a "drive it now deal " - this is more a working evolutionary step in my build process so to say

and ,actually.. it's not so tired
o-e motor and car have 28 000 MILES...

finally found the turbo I want , the way I want it with no turbine housing
(I have a bored out .63 turbine housing for it already)...