2.2 2.5 melling cams

[24kilo]

I'm thinking that the SPD-28 is right for my apps. Price from Autozone 60 bucks.

Check out these cams.

Slider N/A
SPD-28 INT @.05 217 adv 274 lift.437 112 HYD
EXH 217 274 437 104 HYD


SPD-29 INT @.05 217 adv 273 lift .437 112 HYD
EXH. 217 273 .437 104 HYD



TURBO
SPD-30 INT @.05 213 adv 268 lift .437 HYD
EXH. 213 268 .437



ROLLER
SPD-34 INT. @.05 194 adv 267 lift. 433 113 HYD
EXH. 190 264 . 433 113

SPD-35 INT. @.05 194 adv 267 lift. 441 HYD
EXH. 190 .441

Here's the link on the specs for open and close degs

http://data.melling.com/pdfs/engine%...ifications.pdf

[turbovanman²]

Nice find but the roller cams are pretty tame.

[Clay]

your link at the bottom is bad

[turbovanman²]

^That too.

[24kilo]

http://data.melling.com/pdfs/engine%20parts%20camshaft%20specifications.pdf


BTW here's the specs on Comp and mopar cams, For 60 bucks I think the Melling is worth a shot.


Comp Price $130-$150

HYDRAULIC-Good torque and Hyd. Hyd. 1200 to 5000 22-123-4 260H adv260 260 .05 212 212 lift .460 .460 108°

HYDRAULIC-Great cam for everyday Hyd. Hyd. 1500 to 5200 22-127-4 268H adv268 268 .05 224 224
lift .460 .460 108°

street driving. Broad powerband.
HYDRAULIC-Best cam for performance Hyd. Hyd. 1800 to 5500 22-131-4 280H adv 280 280 .05 234 234 lift .460 .460 108°

Slightly choppy idle.
HYDRAULIC-For use in turbo engines Hyd. Hyd. 3000 to 6000 22-124-4 260MT adv 260 260 .05 218 218 .lift 499 .499 112°





Mopar Performance Price $120-$150

P4529320 36OL 252/252 .430/.430 108

P4452676 24OL 240/248 .460/.460 110

P4529314 24OL 240/248 .460/.460 110

[Boosted Baron]

Like they say, speed costs money. MAYBE for a daily driver, but I would definately spend the extra cash and get something better for any kind of performance use.

[24kilo]

So buying a cam for half the price from one of the biggest auto suppliers in the U.S with less DUR than a 767 and a 320 is a bad thing. My desktop Dyno with all the mods I have or will have puts the Melling SPD-28 at 167Lbs Torque 4000rpm
151HP at 5500 RPM. That's a N/A car BTW, Not to shabby.....

[22mopar]

So buying a cam for half the price from one of the biggest auto suppliers in the U.S with less DUR than a 767 and a 320 is a bad thing. My desktop Dyno with all the mods I have or will have puts the Melling SPD-28 at 167Lbs Torque 4000rpm
151HP at 5500 RPM. That's a N/A car BTW, Not to shabby.....


you are a pipe smoking dreamer. get a clue and get off the damn board until you figure out how to work on a car instead of playing wannabe on the computers.:mad:

[Clay]

easy there, easy. ;)

[24kilo]

you are a pipe smoking dreamer. get a clue and get off the damn board until you figure out how to work on a car instead of playing wannabe on the computers.:mad:


F.O.A.D

[t3rse]

you are a pipe smoking dreamer. get a clue and get off the damn board until you figure out how to work on a car instead of playing wannabe on the computers.:mad:

HAHAHAHAHA, pass the pipe yo!

[24kilo]

you are a pipe smoking dreamer. get a clue and get off the damn board until you figure out how to work on a car instead of playing wannabe on the computers.:mad:

You know it's funny, I just found out you are Allmotor from the turbo dodge forum. I posted these cams over there to let the other guys know about them, Here's the quote you left on that topic.


"I put all them numbers in my Desk top dyno program and got some impressive results. that's exactly the cams you should use."

Link
http://www.turbododge.com/forums/f11/f56/135953-melling-cams.html

[Turbodave]

Yeah, Mike doesn't care which forum he pokes fun at you on...

While he comes across as a crabby old man he does have a point in suggesting that there is a big difference between the real-world results and what a software dyno program tells you.

[johnl]

This is gettin spicy, sort a like the old days at TD.:eyebrows:

[24kilo]

Yeah, Mike doesn't care which forum he pokes fun at you on...

While he comes across as a crabby old man he does have a point in suggesting that there is a big difference between the real-world results and what a software dyno program tells you.


That's true but like all things it's a tool. Just like the one HE was talking about that He used to run the specs on the cams. Just bringing up the hypocrisy .

[Turbodave]

That's true but like all things it's a tool. Just like the one HE was talking about that He used to run the specs on the cams. Just bringing up the hypocrisy .

I'm pretty sure Mike didn't run the specs on a desktop dyno program. HE was mocking YOU... That's his sense of humor....

[8valves]

His post on TD was well after yours over here. His point was, as Dave pointed out, mockery.

[My96z]

Which of the above listed cams would be good for a heavy van?

street driving. Broad powerband.
HYDRAULIC-Best cam for performance Hyd. Hyd. 1800 to 5500 22-131-4 280H adv 280 280 .05 234 234 lift .460 .460 108°

^Is this one a roller?

[chilort]

The mocking is great because it tells a newb approximately Jack and S#!t, and Jack left town last week.

[Clay]

holy old thread batman! I think this one just needs to die....... again. ;)

[elle bawdy]

any feedback on the melling cam?